DRUP vs. QQQ
DRUP (GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRUP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRUP returned 8.53%/yr vs 16.01%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DRUP charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
DRUP vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRUP achieves a -10.33% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.45% return.
DRUP
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- -10.33%
- 6M
- -11.73%
- 1Y
- -0.34%
- 3Y*
- 15.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.53%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 14.99%
- 1Y
- 34.88%
- 3Y*
- 26.05%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 22.07%
DRUP vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | -10.33% | 18.18% | 23.11% | 42.32% | -28.18% | 26.13% | 28.71% | 11.72% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.45% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 12.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRUP and QQQ is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2019 | 0.90 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DRUP and QQQ has dropped to 0.68 - well below their long-term average of 0.90, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DRUP vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRUP
QQQ
Technology
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
DRUP
QQQ
Healthcare
DRUP
QQQ
Communication Services
DRUP
QQQ
Financial Services
DRUP
QQQ
Industrials
DRUP
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
DRUP
QQQ
Basic Materials
DRUP
-
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
DRUP
-
QQQ
Energy
DRUP
-
QQQ
Real Estate
DRUP
-
QQQ
Utilities
DRUP
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRUP vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
DRUP
QQQ
DRUP vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRUP | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.35 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 2.93 | -2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.04 | 10.86 | -10.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRUP vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRUP drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRUP and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRUP | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -82.97% | +51.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.21% | -11.96% | -11.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.77% | -22.77% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | -35.12% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.97% | -4.25% | -8.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -32.73% | +24.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.55% | 3.22% | +6.33% |
Volatility
DRUP vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) is 8.52%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that DRUP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRUP | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.52% | 9.17% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.61% | 14.57% | +2.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.02% | 17.96% | +2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 22.69% | -0.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.22% | 22.42% | +0.80% |
DRUP vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRUP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRUP vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
DRUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRUP and QQQ have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to DRUP (8.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRUP dropped -31.29% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 16.01% vs 8.53% for DRUP. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, DRUP has been the lower-risk option at 8.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 16.01% return vs 8.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DRUP.
QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.43%, compared with 0.00% for DRUP.
DRUP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. DRUP tracks Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DRUP and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRUP and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer