DRUP vs. FBL
DRUP (GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF) and FBL (GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRUP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq US Large Cap Select Disruptors Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FBL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. DRUP is passively managed, while FBL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DRUP returned 16.20%/yr vs 12.26%/yr for FBL. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DRUP charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for FBL.
Performance
DRUP vs. FBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRUP achieves a -2.96% return, which is significantly higher than FBL's -39.43% return.
DRUP
- 1D
- 1.79%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 1Y
- 3.95%
- 3Y*
- 16.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.16%
FBL
- 1D
- 6.66%
- 1M
- -11.35%
- 6M
- -47.34%
- YTD
- -39.43%
- 1Y
- -56.50%
- 3Y*
- 12.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 61.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $66.56K | $69.04K | $115.65K | |
| $25.01M | $36.98M | $35.23M |
DRUP vs. FBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | -2.96% | 18.18% | 23.11% | 42.32% | -5.06% |
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | -39.43% | 0.50% | 112.72% | 341.59% | -1.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRUP and FBL is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2022 | 0.62 |
The correlation between DRUP and FBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DRUP vs. FBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRUP
FBL
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
DRUP
FBL
-
Healthcare
DRUP
FBL
-
Communication Services
DRUP
FBL
Industrials
DRUP
FBL
-
Consumer Cyclical
DRUP
FBL
-
Real Estate
DRUP
FBL
-
Financial Services
DRUP
FBL
-
Basic Materials
DRUP
-
FBL
-
Consumer Defensive
DRUP
-
FBL
-
Energy
DRUP
-
FBL
-
Utilities
DRUP
-
FBL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRUP vs. FBL — Risk / Return Rank
DRUP
FBL
DRUP vs. FBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRUP | FBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 0.87 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | -0.94 | +1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.24 | -1.52 | +1.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRUP vs. FBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRUP drawdown since its inception was -31.29%, smaller than the maximum FBL drawdown of -63.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRUP and FBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRUP | FBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.29% | -63.20% | +31.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.21% | -63.09% | +39.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.77% | -63.20% | +39.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.81% | -60.75% | +54.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.42% | -18.01% | +9.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.96% | 38.96% | -29.00% |
Volatility
DRUP vs. FBL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF (DRUP) is 4.69%, while GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) has a volatility of 31.44%. This indicates that DRUP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRUP | FBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.69% | 31.44% | -26.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.64% | 61.35% | -44.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.52% | 79.78% | -59.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 72.81% | -50.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.14% | 72.81% | -49.67% |
DRUP vs. FBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRUP has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FBL's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRUP vs. FBL - Dividend Comparison
DRUP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRUP GraniteShares Nasdaq Select Disruptors ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.53% | 0.19% |
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | 3.42% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 51.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRUP and FBL have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBL has higher volatility (31.44%) compared to DRUP (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRUP dropped -31.29% vs FBL's -63.20%.
On 3-year performance, DRUP leads with 16.20% vs 12.26% for FBL. On fees, DRUP is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, DRUP has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DRUP has performed better with a 16.20% return vs 12.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DRUP is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for FBL.
FBL has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 0.00% for DRUP.
DRUP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FBL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DRUP and 1.09% for FBL.
DRUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRUP and FBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer