PortfoliosLab logo
FBL vs. METU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FBL and METU is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FBL vs. METU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

FBL:

73.86%

METU:

75.58%

Max Drawdown

FBL:

-59.80%

METU:

-60.05%

Current Drawdown

FBL:

-31.28%

METU:

-31.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBL achieves a 6.57% return, which is significantly higher than METU's 5.72% return.


FBL

YTD

6.57%

1M

35.26%

6M

5.42%

1Y

44.65%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

METU

YTD

5.72%

1M

34.97%

6M

3.91%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBL vs. METU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than METU's 1.07% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FBL vs. METU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBL is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBL is 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBL is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBL is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBL is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBL is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

METU
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FBL vs. METU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF (METU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

FBL vs. METU - Dividend Comparison

FBL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while METU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%.


TTM20242023
FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%51.58%
METU
Direxion Daily META Bull 2X ETF
1.83%1.40%0.00%

Drawdowns

FBL vs. METU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBL drawdown since its inception was -59.80%, roughly equal to the maximum METU drawdown of -60.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBL and METU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FBL vs. METU - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...