PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBL vs. SMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FBL vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FBL vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
-27.59%0.50%112.72%341.59%-1.22%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
8.84%49.17%39.10%73.38%-9.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBL achieves a -27.59% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 8.84% return.


FBL

1D
2.53%
1M
-23.32%
YTD
-27.59%
6M
-42.06%
1Y
-23.67%
3Y*
44.94%
5Y*
10Y*

SMH

1D
2.24%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
8.84%
6M
17.83%
1Y
85.04%
3Y*
44.53%
5Y*
26.15%
10Y*
31.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBL vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FBL vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBL
FBL Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBL Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBL Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

SMH
SMH Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBL vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBLSMHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.30

2.32

-2.62

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.08

2.92

-2.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.41

-0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

5.39

-5.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.77

19.22

-19.99

FBL vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBL Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBL and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBLSMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

2.32

-2.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.28

+0.84

Correlation

The correlation between FBL and SMH is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FBL vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

FBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than SMH's 0.28% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
2.86%2.07%0.00%51.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
0.28%0.31%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%

Drawdowns

FBL vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBL drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBL and SMH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FBLSMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.15%

-84.96%

+23.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.03%

-15.95%

-45.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-53.07%

-8.02%

-45.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.87%

-41.35%

+26.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.41%

4.47%

+22.94%

Volatility

FBL vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) has a higher volatility of 27.60% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 11.74%. This indicates that FBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FBLSMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.60%

11.74%

+15.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.08%

24.02%

+30.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.50%

36.88%

+42.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

70.82%

34.68%

+36.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

70.82%

32.29%

+38.53%