PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FBL vs. SMH
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FBLSMH
YTD Return112.27%41.61%
1Y Return126.01%54.65%
Sharpe Ratio1.861.73
Sortino Ratio2.612.24
Omega Ratio1.361.30
Calmar Ratio3.782.39
Martin Ratio10.446.56
Ulcer Index12.74%9.05%
Daily Std Dev71.47%34.39%
Max Drawdown-35.25%-95.73%
Current Drawdown-6.71%-11.96%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between FBL and SMH is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

FBL vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FBL achieves a 112.27% return, which is significantly higher than SMH's 41.61% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
32.72%
5.87%
FBL
SMH

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBL vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.


FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
Expense ratio chart for FBL: current value at 1.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.15%
Expense ratio chart for SMH: current value at 0.35% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.35%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FBL vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FBL, currently valued at 1.86, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.86
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FBL, currently valued at 2.61, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.61
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FBL, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FBL, currently valued at 3.77, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.78
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FBL, currently valued at 10.44, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0010.44
SMH
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SMH, currently valued at 1.73, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.73
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SMH, currently valued at 2.24, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.24
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SMH, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.30
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SMH, currently valued at 2.39, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.39
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SMH, currently valued at 6.56, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.006.56

FBL vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBL and SMH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.86
1.73
FBL
SMH

Dividends

FBL vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

FBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.30%, more than SMH's 0.42% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
24.30%51.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMH
VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF
0.42%0.60%2.37%1.02%1.38%6.00%3.75%2.85%1.61%4.28%2.31%3.11%

Drawdowns

FBL vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBL drawdown since its inception was -35.25%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -95.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBL and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.71%
-11.96%
FBL
SMH

Volatility

FBL vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) has a higher volatility of 16.02% compared to VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 7.71%. This indicates that FBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.02%
7.71%
FBL
SMH