FBL vs. MSFL
Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL).
FBL and MSFL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FBL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Dec 12, 2022. MSFL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Mar 15, 2024.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FBL or MSFL.
Correlation
The correlation between FBL and MSFL is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FBL vs. MSFL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FBL:
61.00%
MSFL:
41.88%
FBL:
-35.25%
MSFL:
-29.48%
FBL:
-11.23%
MSFL:
-26.38%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBL achieves a 37.66% return, which is significantly higher than MSFL's -4.00% return.
FBL
37.66%
25.66%
59.22%
82.78%
N/A
N/A
MSFL
-4.00%
-6.81%
-5.63%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FBL vs. MSFL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FBL and MSFL have an expense ratio of 1.15%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FBL vs. MSFL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FBL
MSFL
FBL vs. MSFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Not enough dataDividends
FBL vs. MSFL - Dividend Comparison
Neither FBL nor MSFL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 51.58% |
MSFL GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FBL vs. MSFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBL drawdown since its inception was -35.25%, which is greater than MSFL's maximum drawdown of -29.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBL and MSFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FBL vs. MSFL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) is 11.38%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) has a volatility of 18.37%. This indicates that FBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.