PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FBL vs. MSFL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FBLMSFL
Daily Std Dev71.47%40.02%
Max Drawdown-35.25%-29.48%
Current Drawdown-6.71%-20.87%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between FBL and MSFL is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

FBL vs. MSFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
32.72%
-5.27%
FBL
MSFL

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBL vs. MSFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FBL and MSFL have an expense ratio of 1.15%.


FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
Expense ratio chart for FBL: current value at 1.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.15%
Expense ratio chart for MSFL: current value at 1.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.15%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FBL vs. MSFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FBL, currently valued at 1.86, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.001.86
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FBL, currently valued at 2.61, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.61
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FBL, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.36
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FBL, currently valued at 3.77, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.78
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FBL, currently valued at 10.44, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0010.44
MSFL
Sharpe ratio
No data

FBL vs. MSFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

FBL vs. MSFL - Dividend Comparison

FBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.30%, while MSFL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2023
FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
24.30%51.58%
MSFL
GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FBL vs. MSFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBL drawdown since its inception was -35.25%, which is greater than MSFL's maximum drawdown of -29.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBL and MSFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.71%
-20.87%
FBL
MSFL

Volatility

FBL vs. MSFL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) have volatilities of 16.02% and 16.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
16.02%
16.21%
FBL
MSFL