FBL vs. META

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META).

FBL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Dec 12, 2022.

Performance

FBL vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FBL vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF	-29.38%	0.50%	112.72%	341.59%	-1.22%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-13.25%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	0.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBL achieves a -29.38% return, which is significantly lower than META's -13.25% return.

FBL

• 1D: 13.10%
• 1M: -24.07%
• YTD: -29.38%
• 6M: -46.10%
• 1Y: -23.10%
• 3Y*: 43.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

META

• 1D: 6.67%
• 1M: -11.66%
• YTD: -13.25%
• 6M: -21.96%
• 1Y: -0.42%
• 3Y*: 39.60%
• 5Y*: 14.06%
• 10Y*: 17.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FBL vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBL

FBL Risk / Return Rank: 8
FBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
FBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
FBL Omega Ratio Rank: 11
FBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
FBL Martin Ratio Rank: 6

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 40
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
META Omega Ratio Rank: 37
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
META Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBL vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBL	META	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.29	-0.01	-0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.09	0.29	-0.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.04	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.38	-0.01	-0.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.85	-0.04	-0.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBL vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBL Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBL and META, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBL	META	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29	-0.01	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.10	0.55	+0.55

Correlation

The correlation between FBL and META is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FBL vs. META - Dividend Comparison

FBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than META's 0.37% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF	2.94%	2.07%	0.00%	51.58%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.37%	0.32%	0.34%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FBL vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBL drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBL and META.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBL	META	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.15%	-76.74%	+15.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.03%	-33.30%	-27.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-76.74%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-76.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-54.23%	-27.41%	-26.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.83%	-15.19%	+0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.20%	13.13%	+14.07%

Volatility

FBL vs. META - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) has a higher volatility of 27.39% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 13.64%. This indicates that FBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBL	META	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.39%	13.64%	+13.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.04%	26.73%	+27.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	79.46%	39.91%	+39.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.85%	43.77%	+27.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.85%	38.46%	+32.39%