PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FBL vs. META
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FBLMETA
YTD Return86.56%52.44%
1Y Return125.51%76.87%
Sharpe Ratio1.812.14
Daily Std Dev70.98%36.59%
Max Drawdown-35.25%-76.74%
Current Drawdown-5.95%-0.27%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between FBL and META is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

FBL vs. META - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FBL achieves a 86.56% return, which is significantly higher than META's 52.44% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.40%
6.62%
FBL
META

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FBL vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FBL, currently valued at 1.81, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.81
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FBL, currently valued at 2.57, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.57
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FBL, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FBL, currently valued at 3.64, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.64
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FBL, currently valued at 10.01, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0010.01
META
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for META, currently valued at 2.14, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.14
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for META, currently valued at 3.02, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.02
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for META, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for META, currently valued at 4.25, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.25
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for META, currently valued at 12.89, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0012.89

FBL vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which roughly equals the META Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of FBL and META.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
1.81
2.14
FBL
META

Dividends

FBL vs. META - Dividend Comparison

FBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.65%, more than META's 0.28% yield.


TTM2023
FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
27.65%51.58%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.28%0.00%

Drawdowns

FBL vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBL drawdown since its inception was -35.25%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBL and META. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
-5.95%
-0.27%
FBL
META

Volatility

FBL vs. META - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) has a higher volatility of 12.10% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 5.97%. This indicates that FBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%AprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptember
12.10%
5.97%
FBL
META