PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FBL vs. META
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FBL and META is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 1.0

Performance

FBL vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%1,400.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
520.64%
319.35%
FBL
META

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FBL:

-0.27

META:

0.02

Sortino Ratio

FBL:

0.10

META:

0.29

Omega Ratio

FBL:

1.01

META:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

FBL:

-0.35

META:

0.02

Martin Ratio

FBL:

-1.07

META:

0.07

Ulcer Index

FBL:

18.45%

META:

9.52%

Daily Std Dev

FBL:

73.96%

META:

37.10%

Max Drawdown

FBL:

-56.87%

META:

-76.74%

Current Drawdown

FBL:

-56.87%

META:

-31.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBL achieves a -33.11% return, which is significantly lower than META's -14.28% return.


FBL

YTD

-33.11%

1M

-30.02%

6M

-32.97%

1Y

-20.49%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

META

YTD

-14.28%

1M

-14.14%

6M

-12.86%

1Y

0.30%

5Y*

23.02%

10Y*

19.72%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FBL vs. META — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBL is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBL is 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBL is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBL is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBL is 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBL is 88
Martin Ratio Rank

META
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of META is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of META is 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of META is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of META is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of META is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of META is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FBL vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FBL, currently valued at -0.27, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
FBL: -0.27
META: 0.02
The chart of Sortino ratio for FBL, currently valued at 0.10, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
FBL: 0.10
META: 0.29
The chart of Omega ratio for FBL, currently valued at 1.01, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
FBL: 1.01
META: 1.04
The chart of Calmar ratio for FBL, currently valued at -0.35, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
FBL: -0.35
META: 0.02
The chart of Martin ratio for FBL, currently valued at -1.07, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
FBL: -1.07
META: 0.07

The current FBL Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the META Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBL and META, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.27
0.02
FBL
META

Dividends

FBL vs. META - Dividend Comparison

FBL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.


TTM20242023
FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%51.58%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.40%0.34%0.00%

Drawdowns

FBL vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBL drawdown since its inception was -56.87%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBL and META. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-56.87%
-31.87%
FBL
META

Volatility

FBL vs. META - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) has a higher volatility of 40.79% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 21.00%. This indicates that FBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
40.79%
21.00%
FBL
META
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab