PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHT vs. AMBA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DHT vs. AMBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) and Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHT achieves a 54.52% return, which is significantly higher than AMBA's 9.12% return. Over the past 10 years, DHT has outperformed AMBA with an annualized return of 22.43%, while AMBA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.49% annualized return.


DHT

1D
4.90%
1M
6.67%
6M
40.59%
YTD
54.52%
1Y
74.34%
3Y*
37.73%
5Y*
32.02%
10Y*
22.43%

AMBA

1D
-1.38%
1M
17.48%
6M
11.62%
YTD
9.12%
1Y
15.58%
3Y*
-1.42%
5Y*
-5.30%
10Y*
3.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHT vs. AMBA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
54.52%40.04%3.58%24.07%73.87%1.41%-20.52%118.96%11.32%-9.26%
AMBA
Ambarella, Inc.
9.12%-2.61%18.68%-25.47%-59.47%120.96%51.62%73.13%-40.46%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between DHT and AMBA is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2012

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DHT:

$2.86B

AMBA:

$3.39B

EPS

DHT:

$2.06

AMBA:

-$1.62

PS Ratio

DHT:

5.05

AMBA:

8.19

PB Ratio

DHT:

2.32

AMBA:

5.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

DHT:

$566.07M

AMBA:

$405.19M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DHT:

$268.69M

AMBA:

$238.32M

EBITDA (TTM)

DHT:

$450.13M

AMBA:

-$69.43M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHT vs. AMBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHT
DHT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHT Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

AMBA
AMBA Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AMBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMBA Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AMBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMBA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHT vs. AMBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) and Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DHTAMBADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.11

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

0.30

+4.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.76

0.59

+10.17

DHT vs. AMBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHT Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is higher than the AMBA Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHT and AMBA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DHT vs. AMBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHT drawdown since its inception was -97.12%, which is greater than AMBA's maximum drawdown of -81.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHT and AMBA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHTAMBADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.12%

-81.65%

-15.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.18%

-49.06%

+31.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.96%

-52.74%

+27.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.44%

-81.65%

+47.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.56%

-81.65%

+42.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.33%

-64.35%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.31%

-48.51%

-27.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.19%

24.62%

-17.43%

Volatility

DHT vs. AMBA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) is 16.06%, while Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a volatility of 35.14%. This indicates that DHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHTAMBADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.06%

35.14%

-19.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.23%

57.00%

-27.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.01%

72.60%

-36.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.70%

65.11%

-26.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.66%

57.86%

-16.20%

Dividends

DHT vs. AMBA - Dividend Comparison

DHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.28%, while AMBA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMBA
Ambarella, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
8.28%6.06%10.76%11.72%1.35%2.50%25.81%2.42%2.04%5.57%17.15%6.55%

Financials

DHT vs. AMBA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DHT Holdings, Inc. and Ambarella, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00M160.00M180.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
186.48M
100.36M
(DHT) Total Revenue
(AMBA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DHT vs. AMBA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between DHT Holdings, Inc. and Ambarella, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
60.4%
58.4%
Portfolio components
DHT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 112.62M and revenue of 186.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.4%.

AMBA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.59M and revenue of 100.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.

DHT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 107.66M and revenue of 186.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.7%.

AMBA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported an operating income of -19.42M and revenue of 100.36M, resulting in an operating margin of -19.4%.

DHT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 164.53M and revenue of 186.48M, resulting in a net margin of 88.2%.

AMBA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a net income of -18.09M and revenue of 100.36M, resulting in a net margin of -18.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DHT and AMBA have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMBA has higher volatility (35.14%) compared to DHT (16.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHT dropped -97.12% vs AMBA's -81.65%.

DHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHT and AMBA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer