PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHT vs. GSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DHT vs. GSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) and Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHT achieves a 72.01% return, which is significantly higher than GSL's 12.84% return. Over the past 10 years, DHT has outperformed GSL with an annualized return of 23.29%, while GSL has yielded a comparatively lower 18.00% annualized return.


DHT

1D
4.66%
1M
13.75%
YTD
72.01%
6M
72.15%
1Y
85.31%
3Y*
45.70%
5Y*
33.35%
10Y*
23.29%

GSL

1D
1.13%
1M
0.79%
YTD
12.84%
6M
14.64%
1Y
57.39%
3Y*
36.38%
5Y*
21.72%
10Y*
18.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DHT vs. GSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
72.01%40.04%3.58%24.07%73.87%1.41%-20.52%118.96%11.32%-9.26%
GSL
Global Ship Lease, Inc.
12.84%73.47%18.09%28.97%-22.16%100.35%34.65%78.02%-46.55%-22.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DHT and GSL is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2008

0.27

Over the past year, DHT and GSL have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DHT:

$3.19B

GSL:

$1.40B

EPS

DHT:

$2.06

GSL:

$10.76

PE Ratio

DHT:

9.60

GSL:

3.56

PEG Ratio

DHT:

0.32

GSL:

0.13

PS Ratio

DHT:

5.62

GSL:

1.79

PB Ratio

DHT:

2.59

GSL:

0.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

DHT:

$566.07M

GSL:

$770.24M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DHT:

$268.69M

GSL:

$409.23M

EBITDA (TTM)

DHT:

$450.13M

GSL:

$528.32M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHT vs. GSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DHT
DHT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

GSL
GSL Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
GSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DHT vs. GSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) and Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DHTGSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.34

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.63

3.38

+2.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.57

10.04

+2.53

DHT vs. GSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHT Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the GSL Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHT and GSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DHT vs. GSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHT drawdown since its inception was -97.12%, roughly equal to the maximum GSL drawdown of -95.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHT and GSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHTGSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.12%

-95.26%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.22%

-17.09%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.96%

-35.82%

+10.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.44%

-47.50%

+13.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.56%

-86.50%

+46.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-60.29%

-7.98%

-52.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.34%

-58.65%

-17.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.87%

5.73%

+1.14%

Volatility

DHT vs. GSL - Volatility Comparison

DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) has a higher volatility of 11.77% compared to Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) at 9.74%. This indicates that DHT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHTGSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.77%

9.74%

+2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.38%

20.60%

+7.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.64%

27.85%

+6.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.49%

36.91%

+1.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.64%

54.60%

-12.96%

Dividends

DHT vs. GSL - Dividend Comparison

DHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.44%, more than GSL's 6.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
7.44%6.06%10.76%11.72%1.35%2.50%25.81%2.42%2.04%5.57%17.15%6.55%
GSL
Global Ship Lease, Inc.
6.26%6.06%7.56%7.57%8.26%3.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%7.69%

Financials

DHT vs. GSL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DHT Holdings, Inc. and Global Ship Lease, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


50.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
186.48M
198.08M
(DHT) Total Revenue
(GSL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DHT vs. GSL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between DHT Holdings, Inc. and Global Ship Lease, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
60.4%
53.7%
Portfolio components
DHT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 112.62M and revenue of 186.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.4%.

GSL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported a gross profit of 106.27M and revenue of 198.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.7%.

DHT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 107.66M and revenue of 186.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.7%.

GSL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported an operating income of 97.42M and revenue of 198.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.2%.

DHT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 164.53M and revenue of 186.48M, resulting in a net margin of 88.2%.

GSL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Global Ship Lease, Inc. reported a net income of 93.83M and revenue of 198.08M, resulting in a net margin of 47.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DHT and GSL have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHT has higher volatility (11.77%) compared to GSL (9.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHT dropped -97.12% vs GSL's -95.26%.

DHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHT and GSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer