PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DHT vs. ASC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DHT vs. ASC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) and Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DHT achieves a 61.57% return, which is significantly lower than ASC's 69.11% return. Over the past 10 years, DHT has outperformed ASC with an annualized return of 24.05%, while ASC has yielded a comparatively lower 11.06% annualized return.


DHT

1D
0.11%
1M
8.09%
6M
37.66%
YTD
61.57%
1Y
82.61%
3Y*
35.37%
5Y*
35.42%
10Y*
24.05%
ALL TIME*
-1.85%

ASC

1D
0.93%
1M
17.03%
6M
38.61%
YTD
69.11%
1Y
70.55%
3Y*
13.58%
5Y*
42.36%
10Y*
11.06%
ALL TIME*
5.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$9.27M$9.31M$11.54M
$42.84M$48.22M$57.35M

DHT vs. ASC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
61.57%40.04%3.58%24.07%73.87%1.41%-20.52%118.96%11.32%-9.26%
ASC
Ardmore Shipping Corporation
69.11%-10.36%-8.18%5.81%326.33%3.36%-63.57%93.79%-41.63%8.11%

Correlation

The correlation between DHT and ASC is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013

0.52

Over the past year, DHT and ASC have become more correlated (0.73) than their long-term average of 0.52, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DHT:

$2.99B

ASC:

$709.56M

EPS

DHT:

$2.06

ASC:

$2.67

PE Ratio

DHT:

9.02

ASC:

6.50

PEG Ratio

DHT:

0.30

ASC:

0.01

PS Ratio

DHT:

5.28

ASC:

1.93

PB Ratio

DHT:

2.43

ASC:

1.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

DHT:

$566.07M

ASC:

$368.29M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DHT:

$268.69M

ASC:

$139.43M

EBITDA (TTM)

DHT:

$450.13M

ASC:

$146.65M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DHT vs. ASC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DHT
DHT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

ASC
ASC Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ASC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASC Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ASC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASC Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DHT vs. ASC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) and Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DHTASCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.28

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.93

2.48

+2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.25

6.24

+5.01

DHT vs. ASC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DHT Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the ASC Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DHT and ASC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DHT vs. ASC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DHT drawdown since its inception was -97.12%, which is greater than ASC's maximum drawdown of -80.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DHT and ASC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DHTASCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.12%

-80.11%

-17.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.18%

-27.10%

+9.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.96%

-61.41%

+36.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.44%

-61.41%

+26.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.56%

-71.21%

+31.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-62.70%

-17.20%

-45.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.28%

-38.79%

-37.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.52%

10.76%

-3.24%

Volatility

DHT vs. ASC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) is 11.42%, while Ardmore Shipping Corporation (ASC) has a volatility of 12.68%. This indicates that DHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DHTASCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.42%

12.68%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.62%

30.55%

-0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.45%

38.34%

-1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.75%

45.58%

-6.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.69%

51.12%

-9.43%

Dividends

DHT vs. ASC - Dividend Comparison

DHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.92%, more than ASC's 3.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASC
Ardmore Shipping Corporation
3.74%2.83%8.89%8.16%0.00%0.00%1.53%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.41%4.80%
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
7.92%6.06%10.76%11.72%1.35%2.50%25.81%2.42%2.04%5.57%17.15%6.55%

Financials

DHT vs. ASC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DHT Holdings, Inc. and Ardmore Shipping Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

DHT vs. ASC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between DHT Holdings, Inc. and Ardmore Shipping Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

DHT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 112.62M and revenue of 186.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.4%.

ASC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ardmore Shipping Corporation reported a gross profit of 55.55M and revenue of 116.21M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.8%.

DHT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 107.66M and revenue of 186.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.7%.

ASC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ardmore Shipping Corporation reported an operating income of 49.78M and revenue of 116.21M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.8%.

DHT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 164.53M and revenue of 186.48M, resulting in a net margin of 88.2%.

ASC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ardmore Shipping Corporation reported a net income of 60.51M and revenue of 116.21M, resulting in a net margin of 52.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DHT and ASC have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASC has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to DHT (11.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DHT dropped -97.12% vs ASC's -80.11%.

DHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DHT and ASC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer