DBEF vs. ASHR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR).

DBEF and ASHR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DBEF is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index. It was launched on Jun 9, 2011. ASHR is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the CSI 300 Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2013. Both DBEF and ASHR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

DBEF vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DBEF vs. ASHR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF	2.68%	23.16%	13.40%	20.15%	-5.13%	19.60%	2.03%	24.94%	-9.52%	16.74%
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund	-0.64%	27.02%	11.95%	-12.52%	-27.52%	-1.57%	36.29%	36.50%	-28.45%	33.47%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly higher than ASHR's -0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEF has outperformed ASHR with an annualized return of 11.65%, while ASHR has yielded a comparatively lower 4.13% annualized return.

DBEF

• 1D: 2.34%
• 1M: -5.60%
• YTD: 2.68%
• 6M: 9.22%
• 1Y: 20.92%
• 3Y*: 16.41%
• 5Y*: 12.35%
• 10Y*: 11.65%

ASHR

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: -4.25%
• YTD: -0.64%
• 6M: 1.30%
• 1Y: 25.74%
• 3Y*: 5.52%
• 5Y*: -2.00%
• 10Y*: 4.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEF vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEF has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.

ASHR

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund

DBEF

Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF

Return for Risk

DBEF vs. ASHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEF

DBEF Risk / Return Rank: 74
DBEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
DBEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
DBEF Omega Ratio Rank: 77
DBEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
DBEF Martin Ratio Rank: 75

ASHR

ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 80
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 76
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEF vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DBEF	ASHR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	1.39	-0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	1.90	-0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.27	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	2.16	-0.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.43	9.57	-2.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DBEF vs. ASHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEF Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the ASHR Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEF and ASHR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DBEF	ASHR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	1.39	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	-0.08	+1.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74	0.17	+0.57
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.20	+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between DBEF and ASHR is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

DBEF vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison

DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, more than ASHR's 2.32% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF	5.40%	5.55%	1.29%	4.46%	15.85%	2.28%	2.41%	3.03%	3.22%	2.98%	2.55%	3.70%
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund	2.32%	2.31%	1.13%	2.48%	1.13%	0.88%	0.81%	0.98%	1.32%	0.84%	0.73%	30.13%

Drawdowns

DBEF vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, smaller than the maximum ASHR drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and ASHR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DBEF	ASHR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.46%	-51.30%	+18.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.93%	-11.41%	-0.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.95%	-46.44%	+31.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.46%	-51.30%	+18.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.87%	-23.87%	+18.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.77%	-29.34%	+24.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.70%	2.67%	+0.03%

Volatility

DBEF vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) at 5.81%. This indicates that DBEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DBEF	ASHR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.23%	5.81%	+0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.33%	11.30%	-1.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.55%	18.63%	-2.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.62%	23.85%	-10.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.82%	24.13%	-8.31%