ASHR vs. KBA
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA).
ASHR and KBA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASHR is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the CSI 300 Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2013. KBA is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Index. It was launched on Mar 5, 2014. Both ASHR and KBA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ASHR or KBA.
Correlation
The correlation between ASHR and KBA is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ASHR vs. KBA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ASHR:
0.59
KBA:
0.73
ASHR:
1.06
KBA:
1.26
ASHR:
1.17
KBA:
1.18
ASHR:
0.37
KBA:
0.43
ASHR:
1.69
KBA:
2.12
ASHR:
11.26%
KBA:
10.19%
ASHR:
32.17%
KBA:
29.63%
ASHR:
-51.30%
KBA:
-53.24%
ASHR:
-39.04%
KBA:
-36.38%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASHR achieves a 13.13% return, which is significantly lower than KBA's 15.39% return. Over the past 10 years, ASHR has outperformed KBA with an annualized return of 1.26%, while KBA has yielded a comparatively lower 1.13% annualized return.
ASHR
13.13%
-1.46%
13.80%
16.85%
-0.36%
1.26%
KBA
15.39%
-1.98%
9.72%
18.95%
1.32%
1.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASHR vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ASHR vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ASHR vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison
ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, less than KBA's 2.19% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | 1.12% | 2.48% | 1.13% | 0.88% | 0.81% | 0.98% | 1.32% | 0.84% | 0.73% | 30.13% | 0.27% |
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 2.19% | 2.34% | 26.65% | 9.06% | 0.65% | 1.53% | 3.77% | 1.00% | 4.90% | 29.08% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
ASHR vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASHR drawdown since its inception was -51.30%, roughly equal to the maximum KBA drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHR and KBA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ASHR vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) has a higher volatility of 10.33% compared to KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) at 9.83%. This indicates that ASHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.