PortfoliosLab logo
ASHR vs. KBA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ASHR and KBA is 0.37, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

ASHR vs. KBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
71.59%
62.88%
ASHR
KBA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ASHR:

0.22

KBA:

0.23

Sortino Ratio

ASHR:

0.50

KBA:

0.51

Omega Ratio

ASHR:

1.08

KBA:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

ASHR:

0.12

KBA:

0.13

Martin Ratio

ASHR:

0.32

KBA:

0.34

Ulcer Index

ASHR:

18.82%

KBA:

17.26%

Daily Std Dev

ASHR:

33.27%

KBA:

30.40%

Max Drawdown

ASHR:

-51.30%

KBA:

-53.24%

Current Drawdown

ASHR:

-39.68%

KBA:

-36.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASHR achieves a -0.00% return, which is significantly lower than KBA's 0.26% return. Over the past 10 years, ASHR has outperformed KBA with an annualized return of -2.28%, while KBA has yielded a comparatively lower -2.40% annualized return.


ASHR

YTD

-0.00%

1M

11.83%

6M

-9.85%

1Y

7.37%

5Y*

0.16%

10Y*

-2.28%

KBA

YTD

0.26%

1M

12.27%

6M

-9.01%

1Y

7.08%

5Y*

1.56%

10Y*

-2.40%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ASHR vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASHR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ASHR vs. KBA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASHR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ASHR is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ASHR is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ASHR is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ASHR is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ASHR is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ASHR is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

KBA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KBA is 3535
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KBA is 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KBA is 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KBA is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KBA is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KBA is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ASHR vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ASHR Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is comparable to the KBA Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASHR and KBA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.200.400.600.801.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
0.22
0.23
ASHR
KBA

Dividends

ASHR vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison

ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than KBA's 2.18% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund
1.13%1.13%2.48%1.13%0.88%0.81%0.98%1.32%0.84%0.73%30.13%0.27%
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF
2.18%2.18%2.34%26.65%9.06%0.65%1.53%3.77%1.00%4.90%29.08%0.11%

Drawdowns

ASHR vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASHR drawdown since its inception was -51.30%, roughly equal to the maximum KBA drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHR and KBA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-39.68%
-36.02%
ASHR
KBA

Volatility

ASHR vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) have volatilities of 6.43% and 6.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
6.43%
6.47%
ASHR
KBA