ASHR vs. KBA

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ASHR (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF) and KBA (KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF) are both China Equities funds - ASHR tracks the CSI 300 Index while KBA tracks the MSCI China A Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ASHR returned 4.72%/yr vs 9.23%/yr for KBA. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ASHR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for KBA.

Performance

ASHR vs. KBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASHR achieves a 3.26% return, which is significantly lower than KBA's 6.21% return. Over the past 10 years, ASHR has underperformed KBA with an annualized return of 4.72%, while KBA has yielded a comparatively higher 9.23% annualized return.

ASHR

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: -3.53%
• 6M: 2.54%
• YTD: 3.26%
• 1Y: 22.77%
• 3Y*: 8.10%
• 5Y*: -1.03%
• 10Y*: 4.72%
• ALL TIME*: 5.71%

KBA

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 0.24%
• 6M: 7.78%
• YTD: 6.21%
• 1Y: 32.90%
• 3Y*: 12.04%
• 5Y*: 6.35%
• 10Y*: 9.23%
• ALL TIME*: 9.44%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF	$119.17M	$145.25M	$162.79M
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF	$823.16K	$863.47K	$2.10M

ASHR vs. KBA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF	3.26%	27.02%	11.95%	-12.52%	-27.52%	-1.57%	36.29%	36.50%	-28.45%	33.47%
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF	6.21%	33.88%	15.73%	-16.77%	-3.49%	3.17%	41.62%	35.44%	-26.28%	30.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ASHR and KBA is 0.94, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2014	0.94

The correlation between ASHR and KBA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

ASHR vs. KBA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ASHR	KBA
Technology	30.3%	37.5%
Financial Services	19.8%	16.9%
Industrials	16.9%	14.4%
Basic Materials	9.3%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.7%	5.8%
Consumer Cyclical	5.9%	4.1%
Healthcare	4.3%	4.0%
Utilities	2.9%	3.2%
Energy	2.3%	2.4%
Communication Services	0.6%	1.2%
Real Estate	0.5%	0.4%

Return for Risk

ASHR vs. KBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ASHR

ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 51
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 44
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 55

KBA

KBA Risk / Return Rank: 71
KBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
KBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
KBA Omega Ratio Rank: 64
KBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
KBA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ASHR vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ASHR	KBA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.16	1.59	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	2.22	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.28	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	3.97	-1.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.73	9.40	-2.67

ASHR vs. KBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASHR Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the KBA Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASHR and KBA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ASHR vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASHR drawdown since its inception was -51.30%, roughly equal to the maximum KBA drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHR and KBA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ASHR	KBA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.30%	-53.24%	+1.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.84%	-8.33%	-1.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.12%	-31.23%	-1.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.10%	-39.76%	-4.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.30%	-45.32%	-5.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.88%	-7.29%	-13.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.03%	-25.53%	-3.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	3.51%	-0.12%

Volatility

ASHR vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) have volatilities of 8.11% and 7.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ASHR	KBA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.11%	7.91%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.44%	16.42%	-0.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.82%	20.87%	-1.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.98%	27.34%	-3.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.21%	25.51%	-1.30%

ASHR vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASHR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

ASHR vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison

ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than KBA's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF	2.23%	2.31%	1.13%	2.48%	1.13%	0.88%	0.81%	0.98%	1.32%	0.84%	0.73%	30.13%
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF	1.47%	1.56%	2.18%	2.34%	49.05%	9.07%	0.65%	1.53%	3.77%	1.46%	6.62%	29.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ASHR and KBA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, ASHR and KBA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ASHR or KBA?

ASHR has higher volatility (8.11%) compared to KBA (7.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASHR dropped -51.30% vs KBA's -53.24%.

Which ETF is better, ASHR or KBA?

On 10-year performance, KBA leads with 9.23% vs 4.72% for ASHR. On fees, KBA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, KBA has been the lower-risk option at 7.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ASHR or KBA?

Over the 10-year period, KBA has performed better with a 9.23% return vs 4.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ASHR or KBA?

KBA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ASHR or KBA?

ASHR has the higher dividend yield at 2.23%, compared with 1.47% for KBA.

What is the main difference between ASHR and KBA?

ASHR tracks CSI 300 Index, while KBA tracks MSCI China A Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASHR and 0.60% for KBA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.