PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBEF vs. HFXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBEF vs. HFXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 12.18% return, which is significantly lower than HFXI's 16.19% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEF has outperformed HFXI with an annualized return of 12.97%, while HFXI has yielded a comparatively lower 11.98% annualized return.


DBEF

1D
-1.75%
1M
2.24%
YTD
12.18%
6M
12.25%
1Y
28.10%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
13.34%
10Y*
12.97%

HFXI

1D
-3.31%
1M
1.55%
YTD
16.19%
6M
16.56%
1Y
34.83%
3Y*
20.40%
5Y*
12.02%
10Y*
11.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEF vs. HFXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
12.18%23.16%13.40%20.15%-5.13%19.60%2.03%24.94%-9.52%16.74%
HFXI
IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF
16.19%30.10%7.58%19.56%-10.71%13.96%6.88%23.67%-12.69%22.68%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEF and HFXI is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2015

0.89

The correlation between DBEF and HFXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBEF vs. HFXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBEF
HFXI

Financial Services

24.3%
22.8%

Industrials

19.5%
20.1%

Technology

11.6%
14.6%

Healthcare

10.2%
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
6.3%

Basic Materials

6.3%
5.9%

Communication Services

4.8%
3.5%

Utilities

3.7%
3.6%

Energy

3.7%
3.6%

Real Estate

1.7%
2.5%

Financial Services

DBEF
24.3%
HFXI
22.8%

Industrials

DBEF
19.5%
HFXI
20.1%

Technology

DBEF
11.6%
HFXI
14.6%

Healthcare

DBEF
10.2%
HFXI
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DBEF
7.6%
HFXI
7.7%

Consumer Defensive

DBEF
6.6%
HFXI
6.3%

Basic Materials

DBEF
6.3%
HFXI
5.9%

Communication Services

DBEF
4.8%
HFXI
3.5%

Utilities

DBEF
3.7%
HFXI
3.6%

Energy

DBEF
3.7%
HFXI
3.6%

Real Estate

DBEF
1.7%
HFXI
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBEF vs. HFXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEF
DBEF Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
DBEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEF Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEF Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

HFXI
HFXI Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
HFXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFXI Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HFXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFXI Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEF vs. HFXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBEFHFXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.23

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.66

12.64

+0.02

DBEF vs. HFXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the HFXI Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEF and HFXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBEF vs. HFXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, roughly equal to the maximum HFXI drawdown of -32.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and HFXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBEFHFXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.46%

-32.42%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-10.84%

+1.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.62%

-13.52%

-1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.95%

-22.35%

+7.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.46%

-32.42%

-0.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.75%

-3.31%

+1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-5.44%

+0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.76%

-0.54%

Volatility

DBEF vs. HFXI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) is 4.61%, while IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF (HFXI) has a volatility of 7.21%. This indicates that DBEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBEFHFXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

7.21%

-2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.93%

14.05%

-3.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.95%

16.00%

-3.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.85%

15.12%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.63%

16.57%

-0.94%

DBEF vs. HFXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than HFXI's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBEF vs. HFXI - Dividend Comparison

DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, less than HFXI's 3.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
2.32%5.55%1.29%4.46%15.85%2.28%2.41%3.03%3.22%2.98%2.55%3.70%
HFXI
IQ 50 Percent Hedged FTSE International ETF
3.33%4.19%2.68%2.49%4.65%3.10%2.00%3.19%4.33%2.56%2.71%0.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, DBEF and HFXI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HFXI has higher volatility (7.21%) compared to DBEF (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs HFXI's -32.42%.

On 10-year performance, DBEF leads with 12.97% vs 11.98% for HFXI. On fees, HFXI is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DBEF has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 12.97% return vs 11.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HFXI is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for DBEF.

HFXI has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 2.32% for DBEF.

DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while HFXI tracks FTSE Developed ex North America 50% Hedged to USD Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and New York Life. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DBEF and 0.20% for HFXI.

HFXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBEF and HFXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer