DBEF vs. SCHD
DBEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DBEF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBEF returned 12.71%/yr vs 12.48%/yr for SCHD. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBEF charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
DBEF vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.13% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DBEF having a 12.71% annualized return and SCHD not far behind at 12.48%.
DBEF
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 3.64%
- YTD
- 13.70%
- 6M
- 13.98%
- 1Y
- 30.38%
- 3Y*
- 18.31%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- 12.71%
SCHD
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -1.21%
- YTD
- 17.13%
- 6M
- 17.00%
- 1Y
- 23.94%
- 3Y*
- 13.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.07%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
DBEF vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 13.70% | 23.16% | 13.40% | 20.15% | -5.13% | 19.60% | 2.03% | 24.94% | -9.52% | 16.74% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.13% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBEF and SCHD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DBEF and SCHD has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DBEF vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DBEF
SCHD
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DBEF
SCHD
Industrials
DBEF
SCHD
Technology
DBEF
SCHD
Healthcare
DBEF
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
DBEF
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
DBEF
SCHD
Basic Materials
DBEF
SCHD
Communication Services
DBEF
SCHD
Utilities
DBEF
SCHD
Energy
DBEF
SCHD
Real Estate
DBEF
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBEF vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
DBEF
SCHD
DBEF vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBEF | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.39 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 5.27 | -2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.19 | 12.86 | +0.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBEF vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBEF | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.46% | -33.37% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -4.61% | -4.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.62% | -16.13% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.95% | -16.85% | +1.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.46% | -33.37% | +0.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.95% | +2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.72% | -3.31% | -1.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 1.89% | +0.33% |
Volatility
DBEF vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that DBEF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBEF | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 3.58% | +0.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.80% | 7.75% | +3.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.85% | 11.07% | +1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.83% | 14.38% | -0.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 16.73% | -0.93% |
DBEF vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBEF vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than SCHD's 3.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 2.29% | 5.55% | 1.29% | 4.46% | 15.85% | 2.28% | 2.41% | 3.03% | 3.22% | 2.98% | 2.55% | 3.70% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.31% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBEF and SCHD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBEF has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, DBEF leads with 12.71% vs 12.48% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 12.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for DBEF.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 2.29% for DBEF.
DBEF is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DBEF and 0.06% for SCHD.
DBEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBEF and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer