PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBEF vs. IHDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBEF vs. IHDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBEF achieves a 13.70% return, which is significantly higher than IHDG's 9.49% return. Over the past 10 years, DBEF has outperformed IHDG with an annualized return of 12.71%, while IHDG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.78% annualized return.


DBEF

1D
1.00%
1M
3.64%
YTD
13.70%
6M
13.98%
1Y
30.38%
3Y*
18.31%
5Y*
13.92%
10Y*
12.71%

IHDG

1D
1.28%
1M
4.83%
YTD
9.49%
6M
9.88%
1Y
21.07%
3Y*
11.51%
5Y*
8.46%
10Y*
10.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBEF vs. IHDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
13.70%23.16%13.40%20.15%-5.13%19.60%2.03%24.94%-9.52%16.74%
IHDG
WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund
9.49%14.17%5.97%20.00%-11.53%19.75%10.51%33.42%-12.03%21.93%

Correlation

The correlation between DBEF and IHDG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2014

0.92

The correlation between DBEF and IHDG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

DBEF vs. IHDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DBEF
IHDG

Financial Services

24.3%
15.8%

Industrials

19.5%
24.5%

Technology

11.6%
11.2%

Healthcare

10.2%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
19.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
4.3%

Basic Materials

6.3%
5.1%

Communication Services

4.8%
5.8%

Utilities

3.7%
0.8%

Energy

3.7%
3.7%

Real Estate

1.7%
0.3%

Financial Services

DBEF
24.3%
IHDG
15.8%

Industrials

DBEF
19.5%
IHDG
24.5%

Technology

DBEF
11.6%
IHDG
11.2%

Healthcare

DBEF
10.2%
IHDG
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DBEF
7.6%
IHDG
19.2%

Consumer Defensive

DBEF
6.6%
IHDG
4.3%

Basic Materials

DBEF
6.3%
IHDG
5.1%

Communication Services

DBEF
4.8%
IHDG
5.8%

Utilities

DBEF
3.7%
IHDG
0.8%

Energy

DBEF
3.7%
IHDG
3.7%

Real Estate

DBEF
1.7%
IHDG
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBEF vs. IHDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBEF
DBEF Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DBEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEF Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEF Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

IHDG
IHDG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
IHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
IHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
IHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBEF vs. IHDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) and WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBEFIHDGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.26

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

1.91

+1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.19

7.09

+6.10

DBEF vs. IHDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBEF Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the IHDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBEF and IHDG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBEF vs. IHDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBEF drawdown since its inception was -32.46%, which is greater than IHDG's maximum drawdown of -29.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBEF and IHDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBEFIHDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.46%

-29.24%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-10.49%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.62%

-18.88%

+4.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.95%

-19.52%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.46%

-29.24%

-3.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

-4.02%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.83%

-0.61%

Volatility

DBEF vs. IHDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) is 4.34%, while WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund (IHDG) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that DBEF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IHDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBEFIHDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

4.64%

-0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.80%

11.82%

-1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

14.03%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.83%

14.91%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.80%

15.78%

+0.02%

DBEF vs. IHDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBEF has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IHDG's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBEF vs. IHDG - Dividend Comparison

DBEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than IHDG's 1.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
2.29%5.55%1.29%4.46%15.85%2.28%2.41%3.03%3.22%2.98%2.55%3.70%
IHDG
WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Fund
1.75%1.84%2.42%1.70%13.79%2.77%1.94%1.99%0.22%1.28%1.91%3.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, DBEF and IHDG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IHDG has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to DBEF (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBEF dropped -32.46% vs IHDG's -29.24%.

On 10-year performance, DBEF leads with 12.71% vs 10.78% for IHDG. On fees, DBEF is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, DBEF has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 10.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBEF is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for IHDG.

DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 1.75% for IHDG.

DBEF tracks MSCI EAFE US Dollar Hedged Index, while IHDG tracks WisdomTree International Hedged Dividend Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for DBEF and 0.58% for IHDG.

DBEF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBEF and IHDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer