ASHR vs. SPY
ASHR (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ASHR is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI 300 Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ASHR returned 6.32%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for SPY. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ASHR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
ASHR vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASHR achieves a 13.55% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, ASHR has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 6.32%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.
ASHR
- 1D
- 2.64%
- 1M
- 5.52%
- YTD
- 13.55%
- 6M
- 14.38%
- 1Y
- 42.93%
- 3Y*
- 14.04%
- 5Y*
- 0.31%
- 10Y*
- 6.32%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
ASHR vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF | 13.55% | 27.02% | 11.95% | -12.52% | -27.52% | -1.57% | 36.29% | 36.50% | -28.45% | 33.47% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.74% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between ASHR and SPY is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2013 | 0.38 |
The correlation between ASHR and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ASHR vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ASHR
SPY
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
ASHR
SPY
Financial Services
ASHR
SPY
Industrials
ASHR
SPY
Basic Materials
ASHR
SPY
Consumer Defensive
ASHR
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
ASHR
SPY
Healthcare
ASHR
SPY
Utilities
ASHR
SPY
Energy
ASHR
SPY
Communication Services
ASHR
SPY
Real Estate
ASHR
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ASHR vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
ASHR
SPY
ASHR vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ASHR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.39 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.61 | 3.01 | +2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.31 | 13.54 | +2.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ASHR vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASHR drawdown since its inception was -51.30%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHR and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ASHR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.30% | -55.19% | +3.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.69% | -8.88% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.12% | -18.76% | -14.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.59% | -24.50% | -20.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.30% | -33.72% | -17.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.00% | -1.75% | -11.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.13% | -9.04% | -20.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.64% | 1.97% | +0.67% |
Volatility
ASHR vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.64%. This indicates that ASHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ASHR | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.41% | 4.64% | +1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.47% | 9.75% | +2.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.58% | 12.43% | +5.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 17.14% | +6.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 17.99% | +6.10% |
ASHR vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
ASHR vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF | 2.03% | 2.31% | 1.13% | 2.48% | 1.13% | 0.88% | 0.81% | 0.98% | 1.32% | 0.84% | 0.73% | 30.13% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ASHR and SPY have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASHR has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to SPY (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASHR dropped -51.30% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.70% vs 6.32% for ASHR. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 6.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHR.
ASHR has the higher dividend yield at 2.03%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
ASHR is categorized as China Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. ASHR tracks CSI 300 Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASHR and 0.09% for SPY.
ASHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ASHR and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer