ASHR vs. GXC
Here you can quickly compare and contrast key facts about the Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and the SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC). ASHR launched on Nov 6, 2013 and GXC on Mar 19, 2007. ASHR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GXC's 0.59% expense ratio.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which one is better suits your portfolio: ASHR or GXC.
Key characteristics
| ASHR | GXC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -20.18% | -20.70% |
| 1Y Return | -18.85% | -29.37% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 3.30% | -1.56% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 6.51% | 4.18% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.81 | -0.85 |
| Daily Std Dev | 24.01% | 35.22% |
| Max Drawdown | -50.24% | -50.59% |
ASHR vs. GXC - Performance Comparison
The chart shows the growth of $10,000 invested in ASHR and GXC. Since Nov 7, 2013, ASHR has shown a total return of 73.65%, higher than GXC's total return of 27.47%. ASHR's current dividend yield is 1.11%, less than GXC's 2.05% yield. All prices are adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
ASHR vs. GXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASHR drawdown for the period was -50.24%, roughly equal to the maximum GXC drawdown of -50.59%. The drawdown chart below compares losses from any high point along the way for ASHR and GXC
ASHR vs. GXC - Volatility Comparison
The volatility of ASHR is currently 13.60%, which is lower than the volatility of GXC at 18.44%. The chart below compares the 10-day rolling volatility of ASHR and GXC.