ASHR vs. GXC
Here you can quickly compare and contrast key facts about the Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and the SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC). ASHR launched on Nov 6, 2013 and GXC on Mar 19, 2007. ASHR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GXC's 0.59% expense ratio.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which one is better suits your portfolio: ASHR or GXC.
|5Y Return (Ann)||3.30%||-1.56%|
|10Y Return (Ann)||6.51%||4.18%|
|Daily Std Dev||24.01%||35.22%|
ASHR vs. GXC - Performance Comparison
The chart shows the growth of $10,000 invested in ASHR and GXC. Since Nov 7, 2013, ASHR has shown a total return of 73.65%, higher than GXC's total return of 27.47%. ASHR's current dividend yield is 1.11%, less than GXC's 2.05% yield. All prices are adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
ASHR vs. GXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASHR drawdown for the period was -50.24%, roughly equal to the maximum GXC drawdown of -50.59%. The drawdown chart below compares losses from any high point along the way for ASHR and GXC
ASHR vs. GXC - Volatility Comparison
The volatility of ASHR is currently 13.60%, which is lower than the volatility of GXC at 18.44%. The chart below compares the 10-day rolling volatility of ASHR and GXC.