ASHR vs. FXI
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI).
ASHR and FXI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASHR is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the CSI 300 Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2013. FXI is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the FTSE China 25 Index. It was launched on Oct 5, 2004. Both ASHR and FXI are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ASHR or FXI.
Performance
ASHR vs. FXI - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASHR achieves a 15.10% return, which is significantly lower than FXI's 27.45% return. Over the past 10 years, ASHR has outperformed FXI with an annualized return of 3.04%, while FXI has yielded a comparatively lower -0.28% annualized return.
ASHR
15.10%
-1.61%
11.28%
12.32%
1.15%
3.04%
FXI
27.45%
-3.81%
8.61%
20.09%
-3.69%
-0.28%
Key characteristics
| ASHR | FXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.36 | 0.55 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.73 | 1.03 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.11 | 1.12 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.21 | 0.30 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.16 | 1.79 |
| Ulcer Index | 9.48% | 9.91% |
| Daily Std Dev | 30.85% | 32.29% |
| Max Drawdown | -51.30% | -72.68% |
| Current Drawdown | -37.98% | -39.67% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASHR vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
ASHR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between ASHR and FXI is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ASHR vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ASHR vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison
ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than FXI's 2.27% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | 2.15% | 2.48% | 1.13% | 0.88% | 0.81% | 0.98% | 1.32% | 0.84% | 0.73% | 30.13% | 0.27% | 0.00% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.27% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% | 2.51% | 2.64% |
Drawdowns
ASHR vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASHR drawdown since its inception was -51.30%, smaller than the maximum FXI drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHR and FXI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ASHR vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) have volatilities of 10.35% and 10.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.