PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ASHR vs. FXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ASHR vs. FXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASHR achieves a 13.55% return, which is significantly higher than FXI's -12.04% return. Over the past 10 years, ASHR has outperformed FXI with an annualized return of 6.32%, while FXI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.74% annualized return.


ASHR

1D
2.64%
1M
5.52%
YTD
13.55%
6M
14.38%
1Y
42.93%
3Y*
14.04%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
6.32%

FXI

1D
0.39%
1M
-5.18%
YTD
-12.04%
6M
-12.81%
1Y
-4.15%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
-3.84%
10Y*
2.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASHR vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF
13.55%27.02%11.95%-12.52%-27.52%-1.57%36.29%36.50%-28.45%33.47%
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
-12.04%28.95%28.98%-12.42%-20.66%-20.06%8.92%14.90%-13.28%36.26%

Correlation

The correlation between ASHR and FXI is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2013

0.72

The correlation between ASHR and FXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

ASHR vs. FXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ASHR
FXI

Technology

31.1%
5.4%

Financial Services

19.1%
34.8%

Industrials

16.1%
3.2%

Basic Materials

9.4%
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

6.7%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
26.4%

Healthcare

4.4%
2.3%

Utilities

3.1%
0.4%

Energy

2.5%
5.3%

Communication Services

0.8%
16.3%

Real Estate

0.4%
1.1%

Technology

ASHR
31.1%
FXI
5.4%

Financial Services

ASHR
19.1%
FXI
34.8%

Industrials

ASHR
16.1%
FXI
3.2%

Basic Materials

ASHR
9.4%
FXI
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

ASHR
6.7%
FXI
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ASHR
6.4%
FXI
26.4%

Healthcare

ASHR
4.4%
FXI
2.3%

Utilities

ASHR
3.1%
FXI
0.4%

Energy

ASHR
2.5%
FXI
5.3%

Communication Services

ASHR
0.8%
FXI
16.3%

Real Estate

ASHR
0.4%
FXI
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ASHR vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASHR
ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FXI
FXI Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FXI Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FXI Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASHR vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ASHRFXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

0.98

+0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.61

-0.22

+5.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.31

-0.52

+16.82

ASHR vs. FXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASHR Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is higher than the FXI Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASHR and FXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ASHR vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASHR drawdown since its inception was -51.30%, smaller than the maximum FXI drawdown of -72.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHR and FXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ASHRFXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.30%

-72.68%

+21.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.69%

-18.77%

+11.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.12%

-28.72%

-4.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.59%

-54.94%

+10.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.30%

-60.81%

+9.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.00%

-30.73%

+17.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.13%

-31.21%

+2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.64%

8.03%

-5.39%

Volatility

ASHR vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) at 5.87%. This indicates that ASHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ASHRFXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.41%

5.87%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.47%

14.60%

-2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.58%

19.96%

-2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.96%

31.71%

-7.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.09%

27.66%

-3.57%

ASHR vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASHR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

ASHR vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison

ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, which matches FXI's 2.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF
2.03%2.31%1.13%2.48%1.13%0.88%0.81%0.98%1.32%0.84%0.73%30.13%
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
2.03%2.42%1.76%3.17%2.61%1.60%2.19%2.74%2.69%2.31%2.69%2.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


ASHR and FXI have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ASHR has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to FXI (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ASHR dropped -51.30% vs FXI's -72.68%.

On 10-year performance, ASHR leads with 6.32% vs 2.74% for FXI. On fees, ASHR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FXI has been the lower-risk option at 5.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ASHR has performed better with a 6.32% return vs 2.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ASHR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.

ASHR and FXI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.03%.

ASHR tracks CSI 300 Index, while FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: DWS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ASHR and 0.74% for FXI.

ASHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ASHR and FXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer