PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ASHR vs. ASHS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

ASHR vs. ASHS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS).

ASHR and ASHS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASHR is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the CSI 300 Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2013. ASHS is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the CSI 500 Index. It was launched on May 21, 2014. Both ASHR and ASHS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ASHR vs. ASHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ASHR vs. ASHS - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund		-0.64%27.02%11.95%-12.52%-27.52%-1.57%36.29%36.50%-28.45%33.47%
ASHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF		4.66%39.48%2.68%-10.03%-24.78%17.66%28.22%24.53%-35.91%7.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ASHR achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly lower than ASHS's 4.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ASHR has outperformed ASHS with an annualized return of 4.13%, while ASHS has yielded a comparatively lower 2.07% annualized return.

ASHR

1D
1.33%
1M
-4.25%
YTD
-0.64%
6M
1.30%
1Y
25.74%
3Y*
5.52%
5Y*
-2.00%
10Y*
4.13%

ASHS

1D
0.31%
1M
-11.46%
YTD
4.66%
6M
7.27%
1Y
40.76%
3Y*
7.63%
5Y*
3.78%
10Y*
2.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF

Often compared with ASHR:
ASHR vs. MCHIASHR vs. FXIASHR vs. CNYAASHR vs. SPYASHR vs. GXCASHR vs. CHAUASHR vs. KBA
Often compared with ASHS:
ASHS vs. ECNSASHS vs. FXIASHS vs. KGRNASHS vs. FLCHASHS vs. KBAASHS vs. VOOASHS vs. DXJ

ASHR vs. ASHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ASHR and ASHS have an expense ratio of 0.65%.

ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund
ASHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF

Return for Risk

ASHR vs. ASHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ASHR
ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
ASHS
ASHS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
ASHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASHS Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
ASHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASHS Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASHR vs. ASHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ASHRASHSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

1.70

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.90

2.16

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.32

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.85

-0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.57

10.16

-0.59

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ASHR vs. ASHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ASHR Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the ASHS Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ASHR and ASHS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ASHRASHSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.70

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

0.15

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.08

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.17

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between ASHR and ASHS is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ASHR vs. ASHS - Dividend Comparison

ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, while ASHS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASHR
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund		2.32%2.31%1.13%2.48%1.13%0.88%0.81%0.98%1.32%0.84%0.73%30.13%
ASHS
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF		0.00%0.00%0.69%0.65%1.90%0.76%0.43%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%8.34%

Drawdowns

ASHR vs. ASHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ASHR drawdown since its inception was -51.30%, smaller than the maximum ASHS drawdown of -69.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHR and ASHS.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

ASHRASHSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.30%

-69.90%

+18.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.41%

-14.03%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.44%

-47.81%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.30%

-47.81%

-3.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.87%

-39.59%

+15.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.34%

-48.78%

+19.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

3.93%

-1.26%

Volatility

ASHR vs. ASHS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) is 5.81%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) has a volatility of 8.57%. This indicates that ASHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

ASHRASHSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.81%

8.57%

-2.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

16.21%

-4.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.63%

24.04%

-5.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.85%

26.08%

-2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.13%

25.64%

-1.51%