ASHR vs. ASHS
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS).
ASHR and ASHS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASHR is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the CSI 300 Index. It was launched on Nov 6, 2013. ASHS is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the CSI 500 Index. It was launched on May 21, 2014. Both ASHR and ASHS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ASHR or ASHS.
Correlation
The correlation between ASHR and ASHS is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ASHR vs. ASHS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ASHR:
-0.06
ASHS:
-0.13
ASHR:
0.15
ASHS:
0.08
ASHR:
1.02
ASHS:
1.01
ASHR:
-0.04
ASHS:
-0.08
ASHR:
-0.11
ASHS:
-0.28
ASHR:
17.22%
ASHS:
18.58%
ASHR:
32.96%
ASHS:
39.00%
ASHR:
-51.30%
ASHS:
-69.90%
ASHR:
-46.06%
ASHS:
-62.59%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ASHR achieves a -10.58% return, which is significantly lower than ASHS's -9.58% return. Over the past 10 years, ASHR has outperformed ASHS with an annualized return of -2.73%, while ASHS has yielded a comparatively lower -6.00% annualized return.
ASHR
-10.58%
-12.43%
-21.24%
-1.22%
-1.12%
-2.73%
ASHS
-9.58%
-15.29%
-20.37%
-3.89%
-0.71%
-6.00%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ASHR vs. ASHS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ASHR and ASHS have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ASHR vs. ASHS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ASHR
ASHS
ASHR vs. ASHS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ASHR vs. ASHS - Dividend Comparison
ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than ASHS's 0.76% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund | 1.26% | 1.13% | 2.48% | 1.13% | 0.88% | 0.81% | 0.98% | 1.32% | 0.84% | 0.73% | 30.13% | 0.27% |
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF | 0.76% | 0.69% | 0.65% | 1.91% | 0.76% | 0.43% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.34% | 0.59% |
Drawdowns
ASHR vs. ASHS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ASHR drawdown since its inception was -51.30%, smaller than the maximum ASHS drawdown of -69.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ASHR and ASHS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ASHR vs. ASHS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR) is 9.44%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) has a volatility of 11.35%. This indicates that ASHR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.