DAT vs. NOBL
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL).
DAT and NOBL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DAT is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the FactSet Big Data Refiners Index. It was launched on Sep 29, 2021. NOBL is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013. Both DAT and NOBL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DAT vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DAT vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAT ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF | -24.83% | 3.49% | 33.22% | 51.76% | -44.33% | -3.78% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.36% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 11.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAT achieves a -24.83% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 2.36% return.
DAT
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- -24.83%
- 6M
- -28.77%
- 1Y
- -13.31%
- 3Y*
- 11.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOBL
- 1D
- 1.28%
- 1M
- -7.04%
- YTD
- 2.36%
- 6M
- 4.01%
- 1Y
- 6.06%
- 3Y*
- 7.41%
- 5Y*
- 6.31%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DAT vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DAT vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
DAT
NOBL
DAT vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DAT | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | 0.40 | -0.82 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | 0.68 | -1.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.09 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 0.66 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.27 | 2.36 | -3.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DAT | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 | 0.40 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 0.64 | -0.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between DAT and NOBL is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DAT vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
DAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NOBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAT ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.14% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
Drawdowns
DAT vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAT drawdown since its inception was -56.22%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAT and NOBL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAT | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.22% | -35.43% | -20.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.89% | -11.20% | -20.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.23% | -7.04% | -23.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.38% | -3.45% | -22.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.70% | 3.15% | +8.55% |
Volatility
DAT vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.61%. This indicates that DAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DAT | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.86% | 3.61% | +4.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.08% | 8.07% | +12.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.52% | 15.29% | +16.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.61% | 14.40% | +19.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.61% | 16.60% | +17.01% |