PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
DAT vs. LRNZ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DAT and LRNZ is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

DAT vs. LRNZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
13.97%
-12.15%
DAT
LRNZ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DAT:

1.58

LRNZ:

0.28

Sortino Ratio

DAT:

2.13

LRNZ:

0.57

Omega Ratio

DAT:

1.27

LRNZ:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

DAT:

1.28

LRNZ:

0.19

Martin Ratio

DAT:

6.67

LRNZ:

0.99

Ulcer Index

DAT:

6.06%

LRNZ:

7.63%

Daily Std Dev

DAT:

25.58%

LRNZ:

27.09%

Max Drawdown

DAT:

-56.22%

LRNZ:

-61.38%

Current Drawdown

DAT:

-5.80%

LRNZ:

-27.60%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DAT achieves a 38.44% return, which is significantly higher than LRNZ's 4.44% return.


DAT

YTD

38.44%

1M

4.63%

6M

33.77%

1Y

38.52%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

LRNZ

YTD

4.44%

1M

-0.76%

6M

4.31%

1Y

5.63%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DAT vs. LRNZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DAT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than LRNZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


LRNZ
TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF
Expense ratio chart for LRNZ: current value at 0.68% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.68%
Expense ratio chart for DAT: current value at 0.58% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.58%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DAT vs. LRNZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT) and TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for DAT, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.580.28
The chart of Sortino ratio for DAT, currently valued at 2.13, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.002.130.57
The chart of Omega ratio for DAT, currently valued at 1.27, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.271.07
The chart of Calmar ratio for DAT, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.280.19
The chart of Martin ratio for DAT, currently valued at 6.67, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.670.99
DAT
LRNZ

The current DAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the LRNZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DAT and LRNZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.58
0.28
DAT
LRNZ

Dividends

DAT vs. LRNZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither DAT nor LRNZ has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202320222021
DAT
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LRNZ
TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.13%

Drawdowns

DAT vs. LRNZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DAT drawdown since its inception was -56.22%, smaller than the maximum LRNZ drawdown of -61.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAT and LRNZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-5.80%
-27.60%
DAT
LRNZ

Volatility

DAT vs. LRNZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT) is 8.50%, while TrueShares Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) has a volatility of 9.90%. This indicates that DAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LRNZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
8.50%
9.90%
DAT
LRNZ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab