DAT vs. DIVO
DAT (ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF) and DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DAT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the FactSet Big Data Refiners Index, while DIVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. DAT is passively managed, while DIVO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DAT returned 13.76%/yr vs 14.53%/yr for DIVO. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DAT charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for DIVO.
Performance
DAT vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DAT achieves a -1.35% return, which is significantly lower than DIVO's 8.38% return.
DAT
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- 6M
- 14.86%
- YTD
- -1.35%
- 1Y
- 0.18%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.95%
DIVO
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- YTD
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- 18.15%
- 3Y*
- 14.53%
- 5Y*
- 10.70%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.63%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $131.25K | $91.17K | $103.64K | |
| $39.08M | $36.10M | $38.51M |
DAT vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAT ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF | -1.35% | 3.49% | 33.22% | 51.76% | -44.33% | -4.44% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 8.38% | 17.40% | 16.22% | 6.95% | -1.46% | 9.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between DAT and DIVO is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2021 | 0.47 |
The correlation between DAT and DIVO shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DAT vs. DIVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DAT
DIVO
Technology
Communication Services
Utilities
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
DAT
DIVO
Communication Services
DAT
DIVO
Utilities
DAT
DIVO
Healthcare
DAT
DIVO
Basic Materials
DAT
-
DIVO
Consumer Cyclical
DAT
-
DIVO
Consumer Defensive
DAT
-
DIVO
Energy
DAT
-
DIVO
Financial Services
DAT
-
DIVO
Industrials
DAT
-
DIVO
Real Estate
DAT
-
DIVO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DAT vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank
DAT
DIVO
DAT vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DAT | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.33 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | 2.90 | -3.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.24 | 10.27 | -10.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DAT vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DAT drawdown since its inception was -56.22%, which is greater than DIVO's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DAT and DIVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DAT | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.22% | -30.04% | -26.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.70% | -5.95% | -28.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.73% | -12.12% | -22.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.44% | -0.17% | -8.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.76% | -2.58% | -23.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.90% | 1.68% | +14.22% |
Volatility
DAT vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF (DAT) has a higher volatility of 8.43% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 2.86%. This indicates that DAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DAT | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.43% | 2.86% | +5.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.48% | 7.22% | +19.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.69% | 9.32% | +22.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.94% | 11.91% | +22.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.94% | 14.77% | +19.17% |
DAT vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DAT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
DAT vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison
DAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAT ProShares Big Data Refiners ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.37% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DAT and DIVO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DAT has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to DIVO (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DAT dropped -56.22% vs DIVO's -30.04%.
On 3-year performance, DIVO leads with 14.53% vs 13.76% for DAT. On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 14.53% return vs 13.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DAT.
DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 0.00% for DAT.
DAT is categorized as Technology Equities, while DIVO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for DAT and 0.56% for DIVO.
DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs -0.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DAT and DIVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer