CTO vs. GCOW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CTO (CTO Realty Growth, Inc.) is a stock, while GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Over the past 10 years, CTO returned 12.27%/yr vs 9.81%/yr for GCOW. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CTO vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTO achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 12.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CTO has outperformed GCOW with an annualized return of 12.27%, while GCOW has yielded a comparatively lower 9.81% annualized return.

CTO

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: -2.48%
• YTD: 11.22%
• 6M: 16.50%
• 1Y: 19.24%
• 3Y*: 16.01%
• 5Y*: 11.00%
• 10Y*: 12.27%

GCOW

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -0.57%
• YTD: 12.25%
• 6M: 13.50%
• 1Y: 27.54%
• 3Y*: 17.57%
• 5Y*: 12.36%
• 10Y*: 9.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CTO vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CTO CTO Realty Growth, Inc.	11.22%	1.63%	23.61%	3.66%	-3.99%	56.60%	15.32%	15.71%	-16.96%	19.26%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	12.25%	27.34%	3.52%	13.95%	5.49%	14.58%	-4.33%	17.81%	-7.99%	20.71%

Correlation

The correlation between CTO and GCOW is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016	0.36

The correlation between CTO and GCOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CTO vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTO

CTO Risk / Return Rank: 66
CTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
CTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CTO Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
CTO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

GCOW

GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 82
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 77
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTO vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CTO	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	2.56	-1.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	3.68	-2.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.45	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.22	5.80	-4.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.09	15.21	-12.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CTO vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTO Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTO and GCOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CTO	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	2.56	-1.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.92	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	0.61	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.59	-0.33

Drawdowns

CTO vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTO drawdown since its inception was -74.79%, which is greater than GCOW's maximum drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTO and GCOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	CTO	GCOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.79%	-37.64%	-37.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.80%	-4.77%	-11.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.39%	-12.35%	-9.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.47%	-21.48%	-3.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.85%	-37.64%	-10.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.74%	-2.67%	-1.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.96%	-5.84%	-23.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.23%	1.81%	+4.42%

Volatility

CTO vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) has a higher volatility of 4.81% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 2.75%. This indicates that CTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CTO	GCOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.81%	2.75%	+2.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.12%	7.99%	+5.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.92%	10.80%	+9.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.88%	13.48%	+9.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.31%	16.20%	+12.11%

Dividends

CTO vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

CTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, more than GCOW's 5.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTO CTO Realty Growth, Inc.	7.57%	8.26%	7.71%	8.77%	8.17%	6.51%	31.73%	0.73%	0.51%	0.28%	0.22%	0.15%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	5.39%	4.06%	5.14%	5.28%	4.39%	4.23%	4.12%	4.40%	3.94%	2.79%	1.95%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CTO and GCOW in my portfolio?

CTO and GCOW have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CTO or GCOW?

CTO has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to GCOW (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTO dropped -74.79% vs GCOW's -37.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.