CTO vs. GCOW
CTO (CTO Realty Growth, Inc.) is a stock, while GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) is Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Over the past 10 years, CTO returned 13.42%/yr vs 9.81%/yr for GCOW. Their 0.36 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CTO vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTO achieves a 24.56% return, which is significantly higher than GCOW's 14.53% return. Over the past 10 years, CTO has outperformed GCOW with an annualized return of 13.42%, while GCOW has yielded a comparatively lower 9.81% annualized return.
CTO
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 29.04%
- YTD
- 24.56%
- 1Y
- 45.71%
- 3Y*
- 17.00%
- 5Y*
- 13.08%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.88%
GCOW
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- 6M
- 6.56%
- YTD
- 14.53%
- 1Y
- 27.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- 13.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.76M | $7.37M | $8.46M | |
| $12.93M | $12.74M | $12.43M |
CTO vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTO CTO Realty Growth, Inc. | 24.56% | 1.63% | 23.61% | 3.66% | -3.99% | 56.60% | 15.32% | 15.71% | -16.96% | 19.26% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 14.53% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 5.49% | 14.58% | -4.33% | 17.81% | -7.99% | 20.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTO and GCOW is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2016 | 0.36 |
The correlation between CTO and GCOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTO vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank
CTO
GCOW
CTO vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTO | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.45 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.42 | 3.53 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.05 | 10.89 | +4.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTO vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTO drawdown since its inception was -74.79%, which is greater than GCOW's maximum drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTO and GCOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTO | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.79% | -37.64% | -37.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -7.83% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.39% | -12.35% | -9.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.47% | -21.48% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.85% | -37.64% | -10.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.04% | -0.94% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.85% | -5.81% | -23.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 2.53% | +0.52% |
Volatility
CTO vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) has a higher volatility of 6.04% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 2.96%. This indicates that CTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTO | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 2.96% | +3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.64% | 8.54% | +5.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.53% | 10.90% | +7.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.62% | 13.55% | +9.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.28% | 16.01% | +12.27% |
Dividends
CTO vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
CTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.89%, more than GCOW's 4.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTO CTO Realty Growth, Inc. | 6.89% | 8.26% | 7.71% | 8.77% | 8.17% | 6.51% | 31.73% | 0.73% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.15% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.59% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CTO and GCOW have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTO has higher volatility (6.04%) compared to GCOW (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTO dropped -74.79% vs GCOW's -37.64%.
GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTO and GCOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer