GCOW vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
GCOW and COWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GCOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2016. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. Both GCOW and COWZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GCOW or COWZ.
Correlation
The correlation between GCOW and COWZ is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GCOW vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GCOW:
0.41
COWZ:
0.86
GCOW:
0.62
COWZ:
1.29
GCOW:
1.08
COWZ:
1.15
GCOW:
0.49
COWZ:
1.35
GCOW:
1.63
COWZ:
3.46
GCOW:
2.67%
COWZ:
3.37%
GCOW:
10.64%
COWZ:
13.65%
GCOW:
-37.64%
COWZ:
-38.63%
GCOW:
-8.13%
COWZ:
-7.43%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCOW achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 10.79% return.
GCOW
2.26%
-2.97%
1.16%
2.83%
6.19%
N/A
COWZ
10.79%
-4.05%
4.13%
10.69%
15.08%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCOW vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCOW has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GCOW vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GCOW vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than COWZ's 1.92% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.93% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.92% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.94% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
GCOW vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCOW drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, roughly equal to the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOW and COWZ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GCOW vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) is 3.57%, while Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that GCOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.