PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CTO vs. UHT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CTOUHT
YTD Return22.91%0.33%
1Y Return29.98%8.79%
3Y Return (Ann)10.68%-6.31%
5Y Return (Ann)10.53%-14.45%
10Y Return (Ann)7.91%3.06%
Sharpe Ratio1.330.31
Sortino Ratio1.830.63
Omega Ratio1.291.07
Calmar Ratio1.440.12
Martin Ratio6.920.76
Ulcer Index4.15%11.03%
Daily Std Dev21.63%26.56%
Max Drawdown-74.79%-69.20%
Current Drawdown-3.64%-59.53%

Fundamentals


CTOUHT
Market Cap$587.53M$557.44M
EPS$0.61$1.31
PE Ratio32.1330.73
PEG Ratio0.000.00
Total Revenue (TTM)$118.66M$24.32M
Gross Profit (TTM)$52.34M-$53.20M
EBITDA (TTM)$76.06M$65.05M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CTO and UHT is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

CTO vs. UHT - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CTO achieves a 22.91% return, which is significantly higher than UHT's 0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, CTO has outperformed UHT with an annualized return of 7.91%, while UHT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.06% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
20.10%
14.59%
CTO
UHT

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CTO vs. UHT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) and Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CTO, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.33
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CTO, currently valued at 1.83, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.83
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CTO, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CTO, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.44
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CTO, currently valued at 6.92, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.006.92
UHT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UHT, currently valued at 0.31, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.31
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for UHT, currently valued at 0.63, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.63
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for UHT, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.07
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for UHT, currently valued at 0.12, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.12
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for UHT, currently valued at 0.76, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.000.76

CTO vs. UHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTO Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the UHT Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTO and UHT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.33
0.31
CTO
UHT

Dividends

CTO vs. UHT - Dividend Comparison

CTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, more than UHT's 7.08% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CTO
CTO Realty Growth, Inc.
7.61%8.77%8.17%6.51%32.57%0.73%0.51%0.28%0.22%0.15%0.13%0.17%
UHT
Universal Health Realty Income Trust
7.08%6.66%5.95%4.71%4.29%2.32%4.37%3.51%3.96%5.12%5.24%6.23%

Drawdowns

CTO vs. UHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTO drawdown since its inception was -74.79%, which is greater than UHT's maximum drawdown of -69.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTO and UHT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.64%
-59.53%
CTO
UHT

Volatility

CTO vs. UHT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) is 4.83%, while Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that CTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.83%
7.20%
CTO
UHT

Financials

CTO vs. UHT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CTO Realty Growth, Inc. and Universal Health Realty Income Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items