CTO vs. UHT
CTO (CTO Realty Growth, Inc.) and UHT (Universal Health Realty Income Trust) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — CTO in REIT - Diversified, UHT in REIT - Healthcare Facilities. Over the past 10 years, CTO returned 13.50%/yr vs 2.00%/yr for UHT. Their 0.31 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CTO vs. UHT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTO achieves a 23.99% return, which is significantly higher than UHT's 15.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CTO has outperformed UHT with an annualized return of 13.50%, while UHT has yielded a comparatively lower 2.00% annualized return.
CTO
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- 6M
- 28.46%
- YTD
- 23.99%
- 1Y
- 45.05%
- 3Y*
- 17.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- 13.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.87%
UHT
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -5.24%
- 6M
- 13.59%
- YTD
- 15.09%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 4.29%
- 5Y*
- 0.10%
- 10Y*
- 2.00%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.23M | $7.31M | $8.42M | |
| $3.45M | $4.69M | $6.42M |
CTO vs. UHT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTO CTO Realty Growth, Inc. | 23.99% | 1.63% | 23.61% | 3.66% | -3.99% | 56.60% | 15.32% | 15.71% | -16.96% | 19.26% |
UHT Universal Health Realty Income Trust | 15.09% | 13.29% | -7.45% | -3.63% | -15.25% | -3.35% | -43.24% | 96.94% | -14.89% | 18.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTO and UHT is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 1992 | 0.31 |
The correlation between CTO and UHT shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.53 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CTO:
$823.56M
UHT:
$602.48M
CTO:
$1.49
UHT:
$1.39
CTO:
14.73
UHT:
31.26
CTO:
4.47
UHT:
6.07
CTO:
1.12
UHT:
4.19
CTO:
$161.10M
UHT:
$99.27M
CTO:
$922.00K
UHT:
$93.73M
CTO:
$122.10M
UHT:
$45.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTO vs. UHT — Risk / Return Rank
CTO
UHT
CTO vs. UHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) and Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTO | UHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.17 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.29 | 1.44 | +2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.64 | 3.76 | +10.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTO vs. UHT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTO drawdown since its inception was -74.79%, which is greater than UHT's maximum drawdown of -69.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTO and UHT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTO | UHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.79% | -69.20% | -5.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -14.43% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.39% | -30.32% | +8.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.47% | -38.98% | +13.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.85% | -69.20% | +21.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.49% | -51.33% | +48.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.85% | -15.46% | -13.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 5.50% | -2.46% |
Volatility
CTO vs. UHT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) is 6.04%, while Universal Health Realty Income Trust (UHT) has a volatility of 7.15%. This indicates that CTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTO | UHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.04% | 7.15% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.69% | 17.92% | -4.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.52% | 23.46% | -4.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.66% | 24.16% | -1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.28% | 33.65% | -5.37% |
Dividends
CTO vs. UHT - Dividend Comparison
CTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, which matches UHT's 6.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTO CTO Realty Growth, Inc. | 6.92% | 8.26% | 7.71% | 8.77% | 8.17% | 6.51% | 31.73% | 0.73% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.15% |
UHT Universal Health Realty Income Trust | 6.86% | 7.55% | 7.85% | 6.66% | 5.95% | 4.71% | 4.29% | 2.32% | 4.37% | 3.51% | 3.96% | 5.12% |
Financials
CTO vs. UHT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CTO Realty Growth, Inc. and Universal Health Realty Income Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CTO vs. UHT - Profitability Comparison
CTO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CTO Realty Growth, Inc. reported a gross profit of 32.71M and revenue of 43.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
UHT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Universal Health Realty Income Trust reported a gross profit of -17.31M and revenue of -24.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.6%.
CTO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CTO Realty Growth, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.25M and revenue of 43.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.2%.
UHT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Universal Health Realty Income Trust reported an operating income of -8.96M and revenue of -24.53M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.5%.
CTO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, CTO Realty Growth, Inc. reported a net income of 11.36M and revenue of 43.83M, resulting in a net margin of 25.9%.
UHT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Universal Health Realty Income Trust reported a net income of 5.91M and revenue of -24.53M, resulting in a net margin of -24.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CTO and UHT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UHT has higher volatility (7.15%) compared to CTO (6.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTO dropped -74.79% vs UHT's -69.20%.
CTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTO and UHT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer