GCOW vs. SPY
GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GCOW returned 9.81%/yr vs 15.43%/yr for SPY. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GCOW charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
GCOW vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GCOW having a 9.29% return and SPY slightly lower at 8.95%. Over the past 10 years, GCOW has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 9.81%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.43% annualized return.
GCOW
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- -4.17%
- YTD
- 9.29%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- 22.33%
- 3Y*
- 14.99%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
SPY
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 8.95%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 25.43%
- 3Y*
- 20.41%
- 5Y*
- 13.77%
- 10Y*
- 15.43%
GCOW vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 9.29% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 5.49% | 14.58% | -4.33% | 17.81% | -7.99% | 20.71% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8.95% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCOW and SPY is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2016 | 0.65 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GCOW and SPY has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
GCOW vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GCOW
SPY
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Technology
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
GCOW
SPY
Consumer Defensive
GCOW
SPY
Healthcare
GCOW
SPY
Communication Services
GCOW
SPY
Industrials
GCOW
SPY
Basic Materials
GCOW
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
GCOW
SPY
Utilities
GCOW
SPY
Technology
GCOW
SPY
Financial Services
GCOW
-
SPY
Real Estate
GCOW
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCOW vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
GCOW
SPY
GCOW vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GCOW | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.38 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.28 | 2.87 | +1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.81 | 12.95 | -1.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GCOW vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCOW drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOW and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCOW | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.64% | -55.19% | +17.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.24% | -8.88% | +3.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.35% | -18.76% | +6.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.48% | -24.50% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.64% | -33.72% | -3.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.24% | -2.45% | -2.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.83% | -9.04% | +3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 1.97% | -0.07% |
Volatility
GCOW vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) is 2.75%, while State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) has a volatility of 4.68%. This indicates that GCOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCOW | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 4.68% | -1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.26% | 9.77% | -1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.04% | 12.41% | -1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 17.15% | -3.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 17.98% | -1.80% |
GCOW vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCOW has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
GCOW vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than SPY's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.81% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.00% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCOW and SPY have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPY has higher volatility (4.68%) compared to GCOW (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCOW dropped -37.64% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.43% vs 9.81% for GCOW. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.43% return vs 9.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.
GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 1.00% for SPY.
GCOW is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GCOW and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GCOW and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer