PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCOW vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCOW vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCOW achieves a 14.43% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 9.22% return. Over the past 10 years, GCOW has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 9.74%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 14.89% annualized return.


GCOW

1D
1.80%
1M
6.07%
6M
7.54%
YTD
14.43%
1Y
24.86%
3Y*
15.50%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
9.74%
ALL TIME*
10.55%

SPY

1D
0.24%
1M
1.63%
6M
7.09%
YTD
9.22%
1Y
17.60%
3Y*
18.95%
5Y*
12.46%
10Y*
14.89%
ALL TIME*
10.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$12.50M$13.70M$12.45M
$34.03B$34.70B$38.77B

GCOW vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
14.43%27.34%3.52%13.95%5.49%14.58%-4.33%17.81%-7.99%20.71%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
9.22%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between GCOW and SPY is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2016

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between GCOW and SPY has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GCOW vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GCOW
SPY

Consumer Defensive

22.9%
4.5%

Healthcare

17.2%
9.1%

Communication Services

15.0%
9.2%

Energy

11.2%
3.4%

Industrials

10.5%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
8.8%

Utilities

6.7%
2.3%

Basic Materials

3.6%
1.7%

Technology

2.9%
38.4%

Financial Services

-

12.1%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Consumer Defensive

GCOW
22.9%
SPY
4.5%

Healthcare

GCOW
17.2%
SPY
9.1%

Communication Services

GCOW
15.0%
SPY
9.2%

Energy

GCOW
11.2%
SPY
3.4%

Industrials

GCOW
10.5%
SPY
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

GCOW
7.6%
SPY
8.8%

Utilities

GCOW
6.7%
SPY
2.3%

Basic Materials

GCOW
3.6%
SPY
1.7%

Technology

GCOW
2.9%
SPY
38.4%

Financial Services

GCOW

-

SPY
12.1%

Real Estate

GCOW

-

SPY
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCOW vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCOW vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCOWSPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.25

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.19

1.99

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.81

8.54

+1.26

GCOW vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCOW and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCOW vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCOW drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOW and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCOWSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.64%

-55.19%

+17.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

-8.88%

+1.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.35%

-18.76%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.48%

-24.50%

+3.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.64%

-33.72%

-3.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-2.21%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.82%

-9.01%

+3.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

2.07%

+0.47%

Volatility

GCOW vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 3.18%. This indicates that GCOW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCOWSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

3.18%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.63%

9.87%

-1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.03%

12.68%

-1.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.55%

17.15%

-3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.01%

17.94%

-1.93%

GCOW vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCOW has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCOW vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than SPY's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
4.60%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCOW and SPY have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCOW has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to SPY (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCOW dropped -37.64% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 14.89% vs 9.74% for GCOW. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 14.89% return vs 9.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 1.02% for SPY.

GCOW is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GCOW and 0.09% for SPY.

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCOW and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer