GCOW vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
GCOW and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GCOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2016. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both GCOW and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GCOW or VOO.
Correlation
The correlation between GCOW and VOO is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GCOW vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GCOW:
0.41
VOO:
2.25
GCOW:
0.62
VOO:
2.98
GCOW:
1.08
VOO:
1.42
GCOW:
0.49
VOO:
3.31
GCOW:
1.63
VOO:
14.77
GCOW:
2.67%
VOO:
1.90%
GCOW:
10.64%
VOO:
12.46%
GCOW:
-37.64%
VOO:
-33.99%
GCOW:
-8.13%
VOO:
-2.47%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCOW achieves a 2.26% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 26.02% return.
GCOW
2.26%
-2.97%
1.16%
2.83%
6.19%
N/A
VOO
26.02%
-0.11%
9.35%
26.45%
14.79%
13.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCOW vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCOW has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GCOW vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GCOW vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than VOO's 0.91% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.93% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 0.91% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
GCOW vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCOW drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOW and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GCOW vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 3.57% and 3.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.