GCOW vs. AVDE
GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) and AVDE (Avantis International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index, while AVDE is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. GCOW is passively managed, while AVDE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GCOW returned 13.12%/yr vs 10.26%/yr for AVDE. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. GCOW charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for AVDE.
Performance
GCOW vs. AVDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCOW achieves a 14.43% return, which is significantly higher than AVDE's 10.76% return.
GCOW
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 6.07%
- 6M
- 7.54%
- YTD
- 14.43%
- 1Y
- 24.86%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.55%
AVDE
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 3.02%
- YTD
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 24.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.26%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $76.33M | $87.17M | $95.44M | |
| $12.50M | $13.70M | $12.45M |
GCOW vs. AVDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 14.43% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 5.49% | 14.58% | -4.33% | 7.32% |
AVDE Avantis International Equity ETF | 10.76% | 38.05% | 4.88% | 17.18% | -13.68% | 13.62% | 8.26% | 7.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCOW and AVDE is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019 | 0.82 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GCOW and AVDE has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
GCOW vs. AVDE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GCOW
AVDE
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
GCOW
AVDE
Healthcare
GCOW
AVDE
Communication Services
GCOW
AVDE
Energy
GCOW
AVDE
Industrials
GCOW
AVDE
Consumer Cyclical
GCOW
AVDE
Utilities
GCOW
AVDE
Basic Materials
GCOW
AVDE
Technology
GCOW
AVDE
Financial Services
GCOW
-
AVDE
Real Estate
GCOW
-
AVDE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCOW vs. AVDE — Risk / Return Rank
GCOW
AVDE
GCOW vs. AVDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Avantis International Equity ETF (AVDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GCOW | AVDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.29 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | 2.10 | +1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.81 | 8.22 | +1.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GCOW vs. AVDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCOW drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, roughly equal to the maximum AVDE drawdown of -36.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOW and AVDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCOW | AVDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.64% | -36.99% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.83% | -11.48% | +3.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.35% | -13.46% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.48% | -28.73% | +7.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -1.19% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -6.07% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 2.93% | -0.39% |
Volatility
GCOW vs. AVDE - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Avantis International Equity ETF (AVDE) have volatilities of 3.72% and 3.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCOW | AVDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 3.63% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.63% | 13.17% | -4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.03% | 15.14% | -4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.55% | 16.35% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.01% | 18.84% | -2.83% |
GCOW vs. AVDE - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCOW has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDE's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
GCOW vs. AVDE - Dividend Comparison
GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.60%, more than AVDE's 2.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDE Avantis International Equity ETF | 2.45% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.01% | 2.79% | 2.46% | 1.63% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.60% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCOW and AVDE have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GCOW has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to AVDE (3.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCOW dropped -37.64% vs AVDE's -36.99%.
On 5-year performance, GCOW leads with 13.12% vs 10.26% for AVDE. On fees, AVDE is cheaper at 0.23% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 13.12% return vs 10.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVDE is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.
GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 2.45% for AVDE.
GCOW is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while AVDE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GCOW and 0.23% for AVDE.
GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GCOW and AVDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer