CTO vs. ARCC
CTO (CTO Realty Growth, Inc.) and ARCC (Ares Capital Corporation) are both stocks. CTO operates in REIT - Diversified (Real Estate), while ARCC operates in Asset Management (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CTO returned 12.79%/yr vs 12.46%/yr for ARCC. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CTO vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTO achieves a 17.56% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's -6.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CTO having a 12.79% annualized return and ARCC not far behind at 12.46%.
CTO
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 17.56%
- 6M
- 21.86%
- 1Y
- 23.48%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 11.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.79%
ARCC
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- -6.83%
- 6M
- -5.38%
- 1Y
- -8.17%
- 3Y*
- 9.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.14%
- 10Y*
- 12.46%
CTO vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTO CTO Realty Growth, Inc. | 17.56% | 1.63% | 23.61% | 3.66% | -3.99% | 56.60% | 15.32% | 15.71% | -16.96% | 19.26% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | -6.83% | 1.07% | 19.78% | 20.03% | -3.84% | 36.14% | 0.86% | 31.30% | 8.81% | 4.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTO and ARCC is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2004 | 0.36 |
The correlation between CTO and ARCC shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CTO:
$677.45M
ARCC:
$12.85B
CTO:
$0.38
ARCC:
$1.63
CTO:
55.23
ARCC:
10.97
CTO:
0.60
ARCC:
1.64
CTO:
4.38
ARCC:
4.79
CTO:
1.18
ARCC:
0.91
CTO:
$154.91M
ARCC:
$2.63B
CTO:
-$4.32M
ARCC:
$1.86B
CTO:
$84.13M
ARCC:
$2.05B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTO vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank
CTO
ARCC
CTO vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTO | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.94 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | -0.42 | +2.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.77 | -0.75 | +5.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTO vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTO drawdown since its inception was -74.79%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -79.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTO and ARCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTO | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.79% | -79.36% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.67% | -19.35% | +5.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.39% | -19.35% | -2.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.47% | -21.76% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.85% | -56.77% | +8.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -15.20% | +14.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.94% | -9.11% | -19.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.58% | 10.89% | -5.31% |
Volatility
CTO vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison
CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) has a higher volatility of 5.29% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 4.64%. This indicates that CTO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTO | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 4.64% | +0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.23% | 15.11% | -1.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.01% | 18.65% | +1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 19.96% | +2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.28% | 25.60% | +2.68% |
Dividends
CTO vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison
CTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.30%, less than ARCC's 10.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 10.73% | 9.49% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% |
CTO CTO Realty Growth, Inc. | 7.30% | 8.26% | 7.71% | 8.77% | 8.17% | 6.51% | 31.73% | 0.73% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.15% |
Financials
CTO vs. ARCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CTO Realty Growth, Inc. and Ares Capital Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CTO vs. ARCC - Profitability Comparison
CTO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CTO Realty Growth, Inc. reported a gross profit of 31.01M and revenue of 41.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.3%.
ARCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported a gross profit of 550.00M and revenue of 763.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.1%.
CTO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CTO Realty Growth, Inc. reported an operating income of 10.29M and revenue of 41.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.0%.
ARCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported an operating income of 404.00M and revenue of 763.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.0%.
CTO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CTO Realty Growth, Inc. reported a net income of 4.33M and revenue of 41.17M, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
ARCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ares Capital Corporation reported a net income of 92.00M and revenue of 763.00M, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CTO and ARCC have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CTO has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to ARCC (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTO dropped -74.79% vs ARCC's -79.36%.
CTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTO and ARCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer