CTO vs. ABR
CTO (CTO Realty Growth, Inc.) and ABR (Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — CTO in REIT - Diversified, ABR in REIT - Mortgage. Over the past 10 years, CTO returned 12.79%/yr vs 7.66%/yr for ABR. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CTO vs. ABR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CTO achieves a 17.56% return, which is significantly higher than ABR's -29.86% return. Over the past 10 years, CTO has outperformed ABR with an annualized return of 12.79%, while ABR has yielded a comparatively lower 7.66% annualized return.
CTO
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 4.09%
- YTD
- 17.56%
- 6M
- 21.86%
- 1Y
- 23.48%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 11.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.79%
ABR
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -8.44%
- YTD
- -29.86%
- 6M
- -29.31%
- 1Y
- -44.69%
- 3Y*
- -18.56%
- 5Y*
- -13.53%
- 10Y*
- 7.66%
CTO vs. ABR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTO CTO Realty Growth, Inc. | 17.56% | 1.63% | 23.61% | 3.66% | -3.99% | 56.60% | 15.32% | 15.71% | -16.96% | 19.26% |
ABR Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. | -29.86% | -36.65% | 3.16% | 29.73% | -20.73% | 39.42% | 10.04% | 55.19% | 30.04% | 26.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CTO and ABR is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2004 | 0.30 |
The correlation between CTO and ABR shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.41 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CTO:
$677.45M
ABR:
$1.08B
CTO:
$0.38
ABR:
$0.57
CTO:
55.23
ABR:
8.90
CTO:
4.38
ABR:
1.14
CTO:
1.18
ABR:
0.46
CTO:
$154.91M
ABR:
$940.70M
CTO:
-$4.32M
ABR:
$829.57M
CTO:
$84.13M
ABR:
$878.83M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CTO vs. ABR — Risk / Return Rank
CTO
ABR
CTO vs. ABR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CTO | ABR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.80 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | -0.81 | +2.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.77 | -1.52 | +6.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CTO vs. ABR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CTO drawdown since its inception was -74.79%, smaller than the maximum ABR drawdown of -97.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTO and ABR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CTO | ABR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.79% | -97.76% | +22.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.67% | -55.18% | +41.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.39% | -59.87% | +38.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.47% | -59.87% | +34.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.85% | -72.76% | +24.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -59.55% | +59.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.94% | -41.89% | +12.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.58% | 29.43% | -23.85% |
Volatility
CTO vs. ABR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) is 5.29%, while Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. (ABR) has a volatility of 11.47%. This indicates that CTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CTO | ABR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 11.47% | -6.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.23% | 33.81% | -20.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.01% | 41.37% | -21.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.75% | 37.13% | -14.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.28% | 40.49% | -12.21% |
Dividends
CTO vs. ABR - Dividend Comparison
CTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.30%, less than ABR's 20.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABR Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. | 20.98% | 17.14% | 12.42% | 11.07% | 11.68% | 7.53% | 8.67% | 7.94% | 11.22% | 8.33% | 8.31% | 8.11% |
CTO CTO Realty Growth, Inc. | 7.30% | 8.26% | 7.71% | 8.77% | 8.17% | 6.51% | 31.73% | 0.73% | 0.51% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.15% |
Financials
CTO vs. ABR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CTO Realty Growth, Inc. and Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CTO vs. ABR - Profitability Comparison
CTO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CTO Realty Growth, Inc. reported a gross profit of 31.01M and revenue of 41.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.3%.
ABR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of -21.94M and revenue of 25.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -85.3%.
CTO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CTO Realty Growth, Inc. reported an operating income of 10.29M and revenue of 41.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.0%.
ABR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 8.06M and revenue of 25.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.
CTO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CTO Realty Growth, Inc. reported a net income of 4.33M and revenue of 41.17M, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
ABR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. reported a net income of 12.92M and revenue of 25.74M, resulting in a net margin of 50.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CTO and ABR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ABR has higher volatility (11.47%) compared to CTO (5.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CTO dropped -74.79% vs ABR's -97.76%.
CTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CTO and ABR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer