PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CTO vs. BDN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

CTO vs. BDN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) and Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CTO vs. BDN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CTO
CTO Realty Growth, Inc.
2.63%1.63%23.61%3.66%-3.99%56.60%15.32%15.71%-16.96%19.26%
BDN
Brandywine Realty Trust
-6.77%-41.31%17.13%1.73%-50.65%19.50%-19.06%28.95%-26.04%14.42%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CTO:

$597.00M

BDN:

$460.30M

EPS

CTO:

$0.26

BDN:

-$1.03

PS Ratio

CTO:

4.03

BDN:

0.95

PB Ratio

CTO:

1.05

BDN:

0.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

CTO:

$149.55M

BDN:

$484.45M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CTO:

$111.62M

BDN:

$122.83M

EBITDA (TTM)

CTO:

$8.95M

BDN:

$257.23M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CTO achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly higher than BDN's -6.77% return. Over the past 10 years, CTO has outperformed BDN with an annualized return of 11.75%, while BDN has yielded a comparatively lower -8.63% annualized return.


CTO

1D
0.16%
1M
-3.80%
YTD
2.63%
6M
18.97%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
11.46%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*
11.75%

BDN

1D
-2.21%
1M
-16.93%
YTD
-6.77%
6M
-33.51%
1Y
-33.21%
3Y*
-6.32%
5Y*
-19.37%
10Y*
-8.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CTO vs. BDN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CTO
CTO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
CTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTO Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

BDN
BDN Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
BDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDN Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
BDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDN Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CTO vs. BDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) and Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CTOBDNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.19

-0.93

+1.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.39

-1.34

+1.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.85

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

-0.76

+1.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.52

-1.58

+2.10

CTO vs. BDN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CTO Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is higher than the BDN Sharpe Ratio of -0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTO and BDN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CTOBDNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

-0.93

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

-0.51

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

-0.25

+0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.01

+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between CTO and BDN is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CTO vs. BDN - Dividend Comparison

CTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%, less than BDN's 17.36% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTO
CTO Realty Growth, Inc.
8.21%8.26%7.71%8.77%8.17%6.51%31.73%0.73%0.51%0.28%0.22%0.15%
BDN
Brandywine Realty Trust
17.36%18.15%10.71%13.33%12.36%5.66%6.38%4.83%5.59%3.52%3.76%4.39%

Drawdowns

CTO vs. BDN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CTO drawdown since its inception was -74.79%, smaller than the maximum BDN drawdown of -96.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTO and BDN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CTOBDNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.79%

-96.84%

+22.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.05%

-43.44%

+25.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.47%

-73.17%

+47.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.85%

-73.17%

+25.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.10%

-72.21%

+67.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.11%

-39.12%

+10.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.33%

20.98%

-12.65%

Volatility

CTO vs. BDN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) is 4.93%, while Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) has a volatility of 11.40%. This indicates that CTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CTOBDNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

11.40%

-6.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.36%

26.33%

-12.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.42%

35.66%

-14.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.02%

37.89%

-14.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.27%

35.08%

-6.81%

Financials

CTO vs. BDN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CTO Realty Growth, Inc. and Brandywine Realty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M140.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
38.34M
120.95M
(CTO) Total Revenue
(BDN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CTO vs. BDN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between CTO Realty Growth, Inc. and Brandywine Realty Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
75.0%
-84.6%
Portfolio components
CTO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CTO Realty Growth, Inc. reported a gross profit of 28.76M and revenue of 38.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.0%.

BDN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brandywine Realty Trust reported a gross profit of -102.32M and revenue of 120.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -84.6%.

CTO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CTO Realty Growth, Inc. reported an operating income of 30.05M and revenue of 38.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 78.4%.

BDN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brandywine Realty Trust reported an operating income of 81.77M and revenue of 120.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

CTO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, CTO Realty Growth, Inc. reported a net income of 26.46M and revenue of 38.34M, resulting in a net margin of 69.0%.

BDN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Brandywine Realty Trust reported a net income of -36.85M and revenue of 120.95M, resulting in a net margin of -30.5%.