CTO vs. BDN

In the year-to-date period, CTO achieves a -6.86% return, which is significantly higher than BDN's -23.42% return. Over the past 10 years, CTO has outperformed BDN with an annualized return of 5.73%, while BDN has yielded a comparatively lower -5.70% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) and Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CTO Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is higher than the BDN Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CTO and BDN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CTO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%, less than BDN's 14.89% yield.

The maximum CTO drawdown since its inception was -75.42%, smaller than the maximum BDN drawdown of -97.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CTO and BDN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) is 9.14%, while Brandywine Realty Trust (BDN) has a volatility of 15.08%. This indicates that CTO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CTO Realty Growth, Inc. and Brandywine Realty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.