CRS vs. FCFS
CRS (Carpenter Technology Corporation) and FCFS (FirstCash, Inc.) are both stocks. CRS operates in Metal Fabrication (Industrials), while FCFS operates in Credit Services (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CRS returned 35.01%/yr vs 18.69%/yr for FCFS. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CRS vs. FCFS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CRS achieves a 78.53% return, which is significantly higher than FCFS's 41.69% return. Over the past 10 years, CRS has outperformed FCFS with an annualized return of 35.01%, while FCFS has yielded a comparatively lower 18.69% annualized return.
CRS
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 37.31%
- YTD
- 78.53%
- 6M
- 74.76%
- 1Y
- 126.36%
- 3Y*
- 121.69%
- 5Y*
- 68.28%
- 10Y*
- 35.01%
FCFS
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- YTD
- 41.69%
- 6M
- 37.77%
- 1Y
- 74.51%
- 3Y*
- 35.01%
- 5Y*
- 23.68%
- 10Y*
- 18.69%
CRS vs. FCFS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 78.53% | 86.23% | 141.72% | 94.48% | 29.50% | 2.66% | -39.44% | 42.12% | -29.16% | 43.40% |
FCFS FirstCash, Inc. | 41.69% | 55.68% | -3.20% | 26.45% | 18.03% | 8.47% | -11.74% | 12.72% | 8.48% | 45.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRS and FCFS is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 1992 | 0.26 |
The correlation between CRS and FCFS shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CRS:
$9.51
FCFS:
$10.56
CRS:
59.07
FCFS:
21.29
CRS:
0.05
FCFS:
0.75
CRS:
9.34
FCFS:
1.95
CRS:
$3.03B
FCFS:
$3.88B
CRS:
$900.50M
FCFS:
$2.47B
CRS:
$745.50M
FCFS:
$957.95M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRS vs. FCFS — Risk / Return Rank
CRS
FCFS
CRS vs. FCFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) and FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRS | FCFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.42 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.68 | 5.76 | +0.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.72 | 23.99 | -8.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRS vs. FCFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRS drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, smaller than the maximum FCFS drawdown of -90.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRS and FCFS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRS | FCFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.68% | -90.26% | +5.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.08% | -12.75% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.74% | -23.38% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.86% | -35.70% | -6.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.70% | -50.16% | -24.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.17% | -3.30% | +3.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.23% | -24.24% | -2.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.09% | 3.06% | +5.03% |
Volatility
CRS vs. FCFS - Volatility Comparison
Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) and FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) have volatilities of 12.83% and 12.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRS | FCFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.83% | 12.65% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.92% | 20.52% | +13.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.29% | 29.63% | +18.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.70% | 29.63% | +17.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.88% | 30.64% | +18.24% |
Dividends
CRS vs. FCFS - Dividend Comparison
CRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than FCFS's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 0.14% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 1.13% | 2.17% | 2.74% | 2.75% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 1.41% | 1.99% | 2.38% |
FCFS FirstCash, Inc. | 0.75% | 1.00% | 1.41% | 1.25% | 1.45% | 1.56% | 1.54% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 1.14% | 1.20% | 0.00% |
Financials
CRS vs. FCFS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carpenter Technology Corporation and FirstCash, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRS vs. FCFS - Profitability Comparison
CRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 251.80M and revenue of 811.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.
FCFS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FirstCash, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.05B and revenue of 1.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.9%.
CRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 186.50M and revenue of 811.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.
FCFS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FirstCash, Inc. reported an operating income of 781.38M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 74.3%.
CRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a net income of 139.60M and revenue of 811.50M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.
FCFS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FirstCash, Inc. reported a net income of 107.70M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRS and FCFS have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRS has higher volatility (12.83%) compared to FCFS (12.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRS dropped -84.68% vs FCFS's -90.26%.
CRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRS and FCFS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer