FCFS vs. OMF
Compare and contrast key facts about FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) and OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF).
Performance
FCFS vs. OMF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCFS vs. OMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCFS FirstCash, Inc. | 18.23% | 55.68% | -3.20% | 26.45% | 18.03% | 8.47% | -11.74% | 12.72% | 8.48% | 45.56% |
OMF OneMain Holdings, Inc. | -19.33% | 39.77% | 15.14% | 63.03% | -27.20% | 23.56% | 34.53% | 88.37% | -6.54% | 17.39% |
Fundamentals
FCFS:
$11.02
OMF:
$6.58
FCFS:
17.06
OMF:
8.13
FCFS:
1.54
OMF:
1.02
FCFS:
$3.66B
OMF:
$6.24B
FCFS:
$2.37B
OMF:
$4.34B
FCFS:
$845.51M
OMF:
$1.54B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCFS achieves a 18.23% return, which is significantly higher than OMF's -19.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FCFS has outperformed OMF with an annualized return of 16.91%, while OMF has yielded a comparatively lower 15.77% annualized return.
FCFS
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- -2.48%
- YTD
- 18.23%
- 6M
- 19.26%
- 1Y
- 57.97%
- 3Y*
- 26.94%
- 5Y*
- 24.32%
- 10Y*
- 16.91%
OMF
- 1D
- 2.43%
- 1M
- -2.78%
- YTD
- -19.33%
- 6M
- -1.77%
- 1Y
- 18.05%
- 3Y*
- 22.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.09%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCFS vs. OMF — Risk / Return Rank
FCFS
OMF
FCFS vs. OMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) and OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCFS | OMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.07 | 0.50 | +1.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.76 | 0.92 | +1.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.12 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | 0.65 | +4.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.09 | 1.86 | +15.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCFS | OMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 0.50 | +1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | 0.26 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.34 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.19 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCFS and OMF is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FCFS vs. OMF - Dividend Comparison
FCFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than OMF's 7.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCFS FirstCash, Inc. | 0.87% | 1.00% | 1.41% | 1.25% | 1.45% | 1.56% | 1.54% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 1.14% | 1.20% |
OMF OneMain Holdings, Inc. | 7.81% | 6.17% | 7.90% | 8.13% | 11.41% | 19.08% | 12.33% | 7.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FCFS vs. OMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCFS drawdown since its inception was -90.26%, which is greater than OMF's maximum drawdown of -68.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFS and OMF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCFS | OMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.26% | -68.66% | -21.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -29.68% | +16.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.70% | -47.93% | +12.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.16% | -68.66% | +18.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.61% | -23.64% | +19.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.37% | -24.39% | +0.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.47% | 10.36% | -6.89% |
Volatility
FCFS vs. OMF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) is 8.03%, while OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) has a volatility of 9.27%. This indicates that FCFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCFS | OMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.03% | 9.27% | -1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.70% | 23.27% | -3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.14% | 35.94% | -7.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.20% | 35.70% | -6.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.45% | 46.29% | -15.84% |
Financials
FCFS vs. OMF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FirstCash, Inc. and OneMain Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities