PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CRS vs. COST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CRS and COST is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

CRS vs. COST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5,000.00%10,000.00%15,000.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
2,897.50%
15,414.85%
CRS
COST

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CRS:

3.52

COST:

2.60

Sortino Ratio

CRS:

4.09

COST:

3.20

Omega Ratio

CRS:

1.52

COST:

1.46

Calmar Ratio

CRS:

7.50

COST:

4.72

Martin Ratio

CRS:

23.86

COST:

12.17

Ulcer Index

CRS:

6.25%

COST:

3.98%

Daily Std Dev

CRS:

42.30%

COST:

18.66%

Max Drawdown

CRS:

-84.68%

COST:

-53.39%

Current Drawdown

CRS:

-13.34%

COST:

-4.08%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRS:

$8.60B

COST:

$435.99B

EPS

CRS:

$4.49

COST:

$16.98

PE Ratio

CRS:

38.43

COST:

57.84

PEG Ratio

CRS:

1.59

COST:

5.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRS:

$2.83B

COST:

$258.81B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRS:

$642.50M

COST:

$32.80B

EBITDA (TTM)

CRS:

$509.40M

COST:

$12.25B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRS achieves a 142.09% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 45.38% return. Over the past 10 years, CRS has underperformed COST with an annualized return of 15.68%, while COST has yielded a comparatively higher 23.42% annualized return.


CRS

YTD

142.09%

1M

-5.94%

6M

71.36%

1Y

142.95%

5Y*

30.83%

10Y*

15.68%

COST

YTD

45.38%

1M

2.80%

6M

12.78%

1Y

47.55%

5Y*

28.68%

10Y*

23.42%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CRS vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CRS, currently valued at 3.52, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.003.522.60
The chart of Sortino ratio for CRS, currently valued at 4.09, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.004.093.20
The chart of Omega ratio for CRS, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.521.46
The chart of Calmar ratio for CRS, currently valued at 7.50, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.007.504.72
The chart of Martin ratio for CRS, currently valued at 23.86, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.0023.8612.17
CRS
COST

The current CRS Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is higher than the COST Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRS and COST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio2.503.003.504.004.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
3.52
2.60
CRS
COST

Dividends

CRS vs. COST - Dividend Comparison

CRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than COST's 2.04% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CRS
Carpenter Technology Corporation
0.47%1.13%2.17%2.74%2.75%1.61%2.13%1.41%1.99%2.38%1.46%1.16%
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
2.04%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%0.97%1.01%

Drawdowns

CRS vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRS drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRS and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-13.34%
-4.08%
CRS
COST

Volatility

CRS vs. COST - Volatility Comparison

Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) has a higher volatility of 10.23% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 4.84%. This indicates that CRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
10.23%
4.84%
CRS
COST

Financials

CRS vs. COST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carpenter Technology Corporation and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab