CRS vs. DRS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS).

Performance

CRS vs. DRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CRS vs. DRS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation	25.26%	86.23%	141.72%	94.48%	-7.79%
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock	30.84%	6.56%	61.23%	56.81%	16.29%

Fundamentals

EPS CRS : $8.62 DRS : $1.55
PE Ratio CRS : 45.71 DRS : 28.70
PEG Ratio CRS : 0.04 DRS : 1.70
PS Ratio CRS : 6.75 DRS : 2.19
Total Revenue (TTM) CRS : $2.94B DRS : $3.65B
Gross Profit (TTM) CRS : $849.50M DRS : $869.00M
EBITDA (TTM) CRS : $711.30M DRS : $208.00M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRS achieves a 25.26% return, which is significantly lower than DRS's 30.84% return.

CRS

• 1D: 6.32%
• 1M: -0.98%
• YTD: 25.26%
• 6M: 60.75%
• 1Y: 118.29%
• 3Y*: 108.12%
• 5Y*: 59.12%
• 10Y*: 29.69%

DRS

• 1D: 2.94%
• 1M: 2.80%
• YTD: 30.84%
• 6M: -1.49%
• 1Y: 36.62%
• 3Y*: 51.44%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CRS vs. DRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRS

CRS Risk / Return Rank: 93
CRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
CRS Omega Ratio Rank: 91
CRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CRS Martin Ratio Rank: 94

DRS

DRS Risk / Return Rank: 67
DRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
DRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
DRS Omega Ratio Rank: 67
DRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
DRS Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CRS vs. DRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CRS	DRS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	0.89	+1.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.04	1.45	+1.59
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.19	+0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.14	1.13	+5.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.29	2.38	+11.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CRS vs. DRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRS Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the DRS Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRS and DRS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CRS	DRS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	0.89	+1.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	1.38	-1.05

Correlation

The correlation between CRS and DRS is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CRS vs. DRS - Dividend Comparison

CRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than DRS's 0.81% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation	0.20%	0.25%	0.47%	1.13%	2.17%	2.74%	2.75%	1.61%	2.13%	1.41%	1.99%	2.38%
DRS Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock	0.81%	1.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CRS vs. DRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRS drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, which is greater than DRS's maximum drawdown of -32.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRS and DRS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CRS	DRS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.68%	-32.48%	-52.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.24%	-32.48%	+13.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.01%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.36%	-7.47%	+3.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.36%	-7.16%	-20.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.27%	15.49%	-7.22%

Volatility

CRS vs. DRS - Volatility Comparison

Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) has a higher volatility of 17.52% compared to Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) at 10.86%. This indicates that CRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CRS	DRS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.52%	10.86%	+6.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.15%	30.52%	+6.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.08%	41.37%	+9.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.78%	38.53%	+8.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.74%	38.53%	+10.21%

Financials

CRS vs. DRS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Carpenter Technology Corporation and Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

CRS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 218.30M and revenue of 728.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.0%.

DRS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 269.00M and revenue of 1.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.4%.

CRS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 155.20M and revenue of 728.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.3%.

DRS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 126.00M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

CRS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a net income of 105.30M and revenue of 728.00M, resulting in a net margin of 14.5%.

DRS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 102.00M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.