PortfoliosLab logo
FCFS vs. EZPW
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FCFS and EZPW is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FCFS vs. EZPW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) and EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FCFS:

0.43

EZPW:

1.10

Sortino Ratio

FCFS:

0.73

EZPW:

1.83

Omega Ratio

FCFS:

1.09

EZPW:

1.20

Calmar Ratio

FCFS:

0.41

EZPW:

0.42

Martin Ratio

FCFS:

1.29

EZPW:

4.99

Ulcer Index

FCFS:

7.37%

EZPW:

6.28%

Daily Std Dev

FCFS:

24.64%

EZPW:

28.17%

Max Drawdown

FCFS:

-90.26%

EZPW:

-97.26%

Current Drawdown

FCFS:

-5.36%

EZPW:

-64.67%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FCFS:

$5.64B

EZPW:

$801.20M

EPS

FCFS:

$6.25

EZPW:

$1.22

PE Ratio

FCFS:

20.36

EZPW:

11.00

PEG Ratio

FCFS:

2.28

EZPW:

0.35

PS Ratio

FCFS:

1.67

EZPW:

0.67

PB Ratio

FCFS:

2.74

EZPW:

0.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

FCFS:

$3.39B

EZPW:

$1.20B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FCFS:

$1.63B

EZPW:

$705.96M

EBITDA (TTM)

FCFS:

$879.03M

EZPW:

$170.86M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCFS achieves a 24.23% return, which is significantly higher than EZPW's 10.07% return. Over the past 10 years, FCFS has outperformed EZPW with an annualized return of 12.20%, while EZPW has yielded a comparatively lower 5.67% annualized return.


FCFS

YTD

24.23%

1M

-4.23%

6M

18.23%

1Y

10.55%

3Y*

21.29%

5Y*

14.54%

10Y*

12.20%

EZPW

YTD

10.07%

1M

-17.84%

6M

5.08%

1Y

30.71%

3Y*

21.06%

5Y*

21.12%

10Y*

5.67%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FirstCash, Inc.

EZCORP, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FCFS vs. EZPW — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCFS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCFS is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCFS is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCFS is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCFS is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCFS is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCFS is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

EZPW
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EZPW is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EZPW is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EZPW is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EZPW is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EZPW is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EZPW is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FCFS vs. EZPW - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) and EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FCFS Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the EZPW Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCFS and EZPW, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FCFS vs. EZPW - Dividend Comparison

FCFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while EZPW has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
FCFS
FirstCash, Inc.
1.19%1.41%1.25%1.45%1.56%1.54%1.27%1.26%1.14%1.20%
EZPW
EZCORP, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FCFS vs. EZPW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCFS drawdown since its inception was -90.26%, smaller than the maximum EZPW drawdown of -97.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFS and EZPW.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FCFS vs. EZPW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) is 4.06%, while EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) has a volatility of 8.82%. This indicates that FCFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZPW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FCFS vs. EZPW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FirstCash, Inc. and EZCORP, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20212022202320242025
836.42M
306.32M
(FCFS) Total Revenue
(EZPW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FCFS vs. EZPW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FirstCash, Inc. and EZCORP, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

45.0%50.0%55.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
50.7%
58.3%
(FCFS) Gross Margin
(EZPW) Gross Margin
FCFS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FirstCash, Inc. reported a gross profit of 424.20M and revenue of 836.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.7%.

EZPW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EZCORP, Inc. reported a gross profit of 178.45M and revenue of 306.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.3%.

FCFS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FirstCash, Inc. reported an operating income of 135.59M and revenue of 836.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.

EZPW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EZCORP, Inc. reported an operating income of 34.25M and revenue of 306.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.

FCFS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FirstCash, Inc. reported a net income of 83.59M and revenue of 836.42M, resulting in a net margin of 10.0%.

EZPW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, EZCORP, Inc. reported a net income of 25.39M and revenue of 306.32M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.