FCFS vs. EZPW
FCFS (FirstCash, Inc.) and EZPW (EZCORP, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Credit Services industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, FCFS returned 16.49%/yr vs 12.60%/yr for EZPW. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
FCFS vs. EZPW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCFS achieves a 28.53% return, which is significantly lower than EZPW's 53.30% return. Over the past 10 years, FCFS has outperformed EZPW with an annualized return of 16.49%, while EZPW has yielded a comparatively lower 12.60% annualized return.
FCFS
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -8.09%
- 6M
- 20.15%
- YTD
- 28.53%
- 1Y
- 57.17%
- 3Y*
- 29.35%
- 5Y*
- 22.42%
- 10Y*
- 16.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.06%
EZPW
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -16.35%
- 6M
- 38.79%
- YTD
- 53.30%
- 1Y
- 113.10%
- 3Y*
- 48.72%
- 5Y*
- 39.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.02%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
EZPW EZCORP, Inc. | $23.79M | $29.04M | $30.38M |
FCFS FirstCash, Inc. | $116.08M | $98.25M | $98.78M |
FCFS vs. EZPW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCFS FirstCash, Inc. | 28.53% | 55.68% | -3.20% | 26.45% | 18.03% | 8.47% | -11.74% | 12.72% | 8.48% | 45.56% |
EZPW EZCORP, Inc. | 53.30% | 58.92% | 39.82% | 7.24% | 10.58% | 53.86% | -29.77% | -11.77% | -36.64% | 14.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCFS and EZPW is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 1992 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, FCFS and EZPW have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
FCFS:
$8.85B
EZPW:
$1.74B
FCFS:
$11.63
EZPW:
$1.76
FCFS:
17.54
EZPW:
16.91
FCFS:
0.62
EZPW:
0.11
FCFS:
1.65
EZPW:
1.68
FCFS:
$4.12B
EZPW:
$1.48B
FCFS:
$3.13B
EZPW:
$865.21M
FCFS:
$1.02B
EZPW:
$256.16M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCFS vs. EZPW — Risk / Return Rank
FCFS
EZPW
FCFS vs. EZPW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) and EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FCFS | EZPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.45 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | 5.91 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.87 | 19.70 | -5.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FCFS vs. EZPW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCFS drawdown since its inception was -90.26%, smaller than the maximum EZPW drawdown of -97.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFS and EZPW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCFS | EZPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.26% | -97.28% | +7.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.13% | -18.35% | +2.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.38% | -20.51% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.70% | -35.94% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.16% | -76.59% | +26.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.28% | -21.80% | +9.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.18% | -58.93% | +34.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.95% | 5.50% | -1.55% |
Volatility
FCFS vs. EZPW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) is 11.10%, while EZCORP, Inc. (EZPW) has a volatility of 15.87%. This indicates that FCFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZPW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCFS | EZPW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.10% | 15.87% | -4.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.72% | 31.30% | -8.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.70% | 38.42% | -8.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.81% | 34.66% | -4.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.75% | 39.06% | -8.31% |
Dividends
FCFS vs. EZPW - Dividend Comparison
FCFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, while EZPW has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EZPW EZCORP, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCFS FirstCash, Inc. | 0.82% | 1.00% | 1.41% | 1.25% | 1.45% | 1.56% | 1.54% | 1.27% | 1.26% | 1.14% | 1.20% |
Financials
FCFS vs. EZPW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FirstCash, Inc. and EZCORP, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FCFS and EZPW have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EZPW has higher volatility (15.87%) compared to FCFS (11.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFS dropped -90.26% vs EZPW's -97.28%.
EZPW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCFS and EZPW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer