PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCFS vs. TRV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FCFS vs. TRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) and The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCFS achieves a 38.75% return, which is significantly higher than TRV's 0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FCFS has outperformed TRV with an annualized return of 18.83%, while TRV has yielded a comparatively lower 12.13% annualized return.


FCFS

1D
5.24%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
38.75%
6M
36.27%
1Y
75.73%
3Y*
31.59%
5Y*
23.45%
10Y*
18.83%

TRV

1D
-0.65%
1M
-3.84%
YTD
0.33%
6M
2.77%
1Y
6.69%
3Y*
20.50%
5Y*
14.87%
10Y*
12.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCFS vs. TRV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCFS
FirstCash, Inc.
38.75%55.68%-3.20%26.45%18.03%8.47%-11.74%12.72%8.48%45.56%
TRV
The Travelers Companies, Inc.
0.33%22.38%28.76%3.93%22.42%13.96%5.31%17.00%-9.64%13.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FCFS and TRV is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 1996

0.25

Fundamentals

EPS

FCFS:

$10.56

TRV:

$33.83

PE Ratio

FCFS:

20.85

TRV:

8.57

PEG Ratio

FCFS:

0.74

TRV:

0.40

PS Ratio

FCFS:

1.91

TRV:

1.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

FCFS:

$3.88B

TRV:

$48.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FCFS:

$2.47B

TRV:

$16.00B

EBITDA (TTM)

FCFS:

$957.95M

TRV:

$8.15B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCFS vs. TRV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCFS
FCFS Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FCFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCFS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FCFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCFS Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

TRV
TRV Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
TRV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRV Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TRV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRV Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCFS vs. TRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) and The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCFSTRVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.67

0.37

+2.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.23

0.64

+2.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.08

+0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.97

0.81

+5.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

25.71

1.85

+23.86

FCFS vs. TRV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCFS Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the TRV Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCFS and TRV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCFSTRVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

0.37

+2.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.69

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.50

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.39

-0.05

Drawdowns

FCFS vs. TRV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCFS drawdown since its inception was -90.26%, which is greater than TRV's maximum drawdown of -55.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFS and TRV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCFSTRVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.26%

-55.11%

-35.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-8.31%

-4.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.38%

-12.47%

-10.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.70%

-18.90%

-16.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.16%

-46.28%

-3.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.31%

-6.74%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.26%

-11.12%

-13.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.96%

3.81%

-0.85%

Volatility

FCFS vs. TRV - Volatility Comparison

FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) has a higher volatility of 9.13% compared to The Travelers Companies, Inc. (TRV) at 4.26%. This indicates that FCFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCFSTRVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.13%

4.26%

+4.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.07%

12.08%

+6.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.56%

18.37%

+10.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.36%

21.80%

+7.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.53%

24.37%

+6.16%

Dividends

FCFS vs. TRV - Dividend Comparison

FCFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than TRV's 1.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCFS
FirstCash, Inc.
0.76%1.00%1.41%1.25%1.45%1.56%1.54%1.27%1.26%1.14%1.20%0.00%
TRV
The Travelers Companies, Inc.
1.52%1.50%1.72%2.06%1.96%2.23%2.40%2.36%2.53%2.09%2.14%2.11%

Financials

FCFS vs. TRV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FirstCash, Inc. and The Travelers Companies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
1.05B
11.92B
(FCFS) Total Revenue
(TRV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FCFS vs. TRV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FirstCash, Inc. and The Travelers Companies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
99.9%
0
Portfolio components
FCFS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FirstCash, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.05B and revenue of 1.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.9%.

TRV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Travelers Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 11.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

FCFS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FirstCash, Inc. reported an operating income of 781.38M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 74.3%.

TRV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Travelers Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 11.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

FCFS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FirstCash, Inc. reported a net income of 107.70M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in a net margin of 10.2%.

TRV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Travelers Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 1.71B and revenue of 11.92B, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FCFS and TRV have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCFS has higher volatility (9.13%) compared to TRV (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFS dropped -90.26% vs TRV's -55.11%.

FCFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCFS and TRV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer