PortfoliosLab logo
FCFS vs. LLY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FCFS and LLY is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FCFS vs. LLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FCFS:

0.43

LLY:

-0.23

Sortino Ratio

FCFS:

0.73

LLY:

-0.04

Omega Ratio

FCFS:

1.09

LLY:

0.99

Calmar Ratio

FCFS:

0.41

LLY:

-0.32

Martin Ratio

FCFS:

1.29

LLY:

-0.59

Ulcer Index

FCFS:

7.37%

LLY:

13.61%

Daily Std Dev

FCFS:

24.64%

LLY:

38.49%

Max Drawdown

FCFS:

-90.26%

LLY:

-68.27%

Current Drawdown

FCFS:

-5.36%

LLY:

-22.74%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FCFS:

$5.64B

LLY:

$648.68B

EPS

FCFS:

$6.25

LLY:

$12.28

PE Ratio

FCFS:

20.36

LLY:

58.84

PEG Ratio

FCFS:

2.28

LLY:

1.10

PS Ratio

FCFS:

1.67

LLY:

13.24

PB Ratio

FCFS:

2.74

LLY:

40.97

Total Revenue (TTM)

FCFS:

$3.39B

LLY:

$49.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FCFS:

$1.63B

LLY:

$40.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

FCFS:

$879.03M

LLY:

$16.27B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCFS achieves a 24.23% return, which is significantly higher than LLY's -4.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FCFS has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of 12.20%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 27.48% annualized return.


FCFS

YTD

24.23%

1M

-4.23%

6M

18.23%

1Y

10.55%

3Y*

21.29%

5Y*

14.54%

10Y*

12.20%

LLY

YTD

-4.09%

1M

-17.77%

6M

-6.90%

1Y

-8.88%

3Y*

34.17%

5Y*

38.59%

10Y*

27.48%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FirstCash, Inc.

Eli Lilly and Company

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FCFS vs. LLY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCFS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCFS is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCFS is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCFS is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCFS is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCFS is 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCFS is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

LLY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LLY is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LLY is 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LLY is 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LLY is 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LLY is 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LLY is 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FCFS vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FCFS Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is higher than the LLY Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCFS and LLY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

FCFS vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison

FCFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, more than LLY's 0.76% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FCFS
FirstCash, Inc.
1.19%1.41%1.25%1.45%1.56%1.54%1.27%1.26%1.14%1.20%0.00%0.00%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.76%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.95%2.46%2.77%2.37%2.84%

Drawdowns

FCFS vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCFS drawdown since its inception was -90.26%, which is greater than LLY's maximum drawdown of -68.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFS and LLY.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

FCFS vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FirstCash, Inc. (FCFS) is 4.06%, while Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) has a volatility of 16.63%. This indicates that FCFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FCFS vs. LLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FirstCash, Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B20212022202320242025
836.42M
12.73B
(FCFS) Total Revenue
(LLY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FCFS vs. LLY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FirstCash, Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20212022202320242025
50.7%
82.5%
(FCFS) Gross Margin
(LLY) Gross Margin
FCFS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FirstCash, Inc. reported a gross profit of 424.20M and revenue of 836.42M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.7%.

LLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eli Lilly and Company reported a gross profit of 10.50B and revenue of 12.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.5%.

FCFS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FirstCash, Inc. reported an operating income of 135.59M and revenue of 836.42M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.

LLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eli Lilly and Company reported an operating income of 5.41B and revenue of 12.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.5%.

FCFS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FirstCash, Inc. reported a net income of 83.59M and revenue of 836.42M, resulting in a net margin of 10.0%.

LLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Eli Lilly and Company reported a net income of 2.76B and revenue of 12.73B, resulting in a net margin of 21.7%.