CRS vs. ATI
CRS (Carpenter Technology Corporation) and ATI (ATI Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Metal Fabrication industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, CRS returned 32.06%/yr vs 27.16%/yr for ATI. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
CRS vs. ATI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CRS having a 65.23% return and ATI slightly lower at 63.33%. Over the past 10 years, CRS has outperformed ATI with an annualized return of 32.06%, while ATI has yielded a comparatively lower 27.16% annualized return.
CRS
- 1D
- 3.17%
- 1M
- -12.99%
- 6M
- 63.58%
- YTD
- 65.23%
- 1Y
- 102.13%
- 3Y*
- 106.41%
- 5Y*
- 70.73%
- 10Y*
- 32.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.12%
ATI
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -0.35%
- 6M
- 55.81%
- YTD
- 63.33%
- 1Y
- 144.32%
- 3Y*
- 58.67%
- 5Y*
- 55.63%
- 10Y*
- 27.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
ATI ATI Inc. | $278.19M | $264.80M | $312.77M |
| $455.19M | $399.26M | $397.99M |
CRS vs. ATI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 65.23% | 86.23% | 141.72% | 94.48% | 29.50% | 2.66% | -39.44% | 42.12% | -29.16% | 43.40% |
ATI ATI Inc. | 63.33% | 108.50% | 21.05% | 52.28% | 87.45% | -5.01% | -18.83% | -5.10% | -9.82% | 51.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between CRS and ATI is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 1999 | 0.68 |
The correlation between CRS and ATI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
CRS:
$25.82B
ATI:
$25.58B
CRS:
$10.53
ATI:
$4.55
CRS:
49.34
ATI:
41.18
CRS:
0.04
ATI:
1.77
CRS:
8.37
ATI:
3.81
CRS:
$3.12B
ATI:
$4.59B
CRS:
$955.40M
ATI:
$1.04B
CRS:
$797.60M
ATI:
$773.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CRS vs. ATI — Risk / Return Rank
CRS
ATI
CRS vs. ATI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) and ATI Inc. (ATI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CRS | ATI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.51 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.87 | 7.78 | -1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.89 | 27.48 | -6.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CRS vs. ATI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CRS drawdown since its inception was -84.68%, smaller than the maximum ATI drawdown of -94.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRS and ATI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CRS | ATI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.68% | -94.72% | +10.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.66% | -18.58% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.74% | -38.02% | +9.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.86% | -38.02% | -3.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.70% | -82.43% | +7.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.08% | -8.16% | -7.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.16% | -60.49% | +33.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.23% | 5.26% | -0.03% |
Volatility
CRS vs. ATI - Volatility Comparison
Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) has a higher volatility of 14.21% compared to ATI Inc. (ATI) at 13.12%. This indicates that CRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CRS | ATI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.21% | 13.12% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.58% | 31.69% | +1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.12% | 44.14% | +5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.58% | 42.77% | +3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.87% | 50.91% | -2.04% |
Dividends
CRS vs. ATI - Dividend Comparison
CRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while ATI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATI ATI Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.51% | 5.51% |
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 1.13% | 2.17% | 2.74% | 2.75% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 1.41% | 1.99% | 2.38% |
Financials
CRS vs. ATI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Carpenter Technology Corporation and ATI Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CRS vs. ATI - Profitability Comparison
CRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 268.90M and revenue of 851.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.6%.
ATI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ATI Inc. reported a gross profit of 262.90M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.8%.
CRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 206.90M and revenue of 851.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.3%.
ATI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ATI Inc. reported an operating income of 163.80M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.2%.
CRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a net income of 162.40M and revenue of 851.00M, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.
ATI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ATI Inc. reported a net income of 118.20M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CRS and ATI have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRS has higher volatility (14.21%) compared to ATI (13.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CRS dropped -84.68% vs ATI's -94.72%.
ATI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CRS and ATI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer