PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLIX vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CLIX vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CLIX vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLIX
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
-11.38%32.81%20.73%28.97%-46.73%-39.96%90.91%17.32%6.34%-2.09%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.32%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%6.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLIX achieves a -11.38% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 2.32% return.


CLIX

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
-11.38%
6M
-10.90%
1Y
16.33%
3Y*
17.97%
5Y*
-8.57%
10Y*

NOBL

1D
-0.04%
1M
-6.79%
YTD
2.32%
6M
4.06%
1Y
6.18%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
6.30%
10Y*
9.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLIX vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CLIX vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLIX
CLIX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLIX vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLIXNOBLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.72

0.41

+0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.09

0.70

+0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.09

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

0.54

+0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.45

1.89

+0.56

CLIX vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLIX and NOBL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLIXNOBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

0.41

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

0.44

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.64

-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between CLIX and NOBL is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CLIX vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

CLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than NOBL's 2.14% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLIX
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
0.60%0.46%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.33%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.14%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Drawdowns

CLIX vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLIX drawdown since its inception was -73.21%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIX and NOBL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CLIXNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.21%

-35.43%

-37.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.57%

-11.20%

-8.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.22%

-17.92%

-50.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.65%

-7.07%

-40.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.54%

-3.45%

-31.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.76%

3.18%

+3.58%

Volatility

CLIX vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) has a higher volatility of 7.71% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.55%. This indicates that CLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CLIXNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.71%

3.55%

+4.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.27%

8.06%

+8.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.90%

15.24%

+7.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.03%

14.39%

+12.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.03%

16.59%

+9.44%