CLIX vs. FALN

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CLIX (ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF) and FALN (iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLIX is a Long-Short fund tracking the ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index, while FALN is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US High Yield Fallen Angel 3% Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CLIX returned -5.94%/yr vs 3.89%/yr for FALN. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLIX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FALN.

Performance

CLIX vs. FALN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLIX achieves a -3.95% return, which is significantly lower than FALN's 1.78% return.

CLIX

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: -3.59%
• YTD: -3.95%
• 6M: -4.31%
• 1Y: 16.32%
• 3Y*: 19.86%
• 5Y*: -5.94%
• 10Y*: —

FALN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 6M: 1.70%
• 1Y: 9.07%
• 3Y*: 9.26%
• 5Y*: 3.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLIX vs. FALN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF	-3.95%	32.81%	20.73%	28.97%	-46.73%	-39.96%	90.91%	17.32%	6.34%	-2.09%
FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF	1.78%	8.92%	7.68%	13.47%	-13.79%	5.40%	14.85%	17.42%	-4.97%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between CLIX and FALN is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.41
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2017	0.43

The correlation between CLIX and FALN shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CLIX vs. FALN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CLIX	FALN
Consumer Cyclical	94.8%	-
Technology	3.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CLIX vs. FALN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLIX

CLIX Risk / Return Rank: 21
CLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
CLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
CLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
CLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
CLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

FALN

FALN Risk / Return Rank: 57
FALN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FALN Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
FALN Omega Ratio Rank: 64
FALN Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
FALN Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLIX vs. FALN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLIX	FALN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.79	2.01	-1.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.19	2.91	-1.72
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.39	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.89	2.28	-1.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.44	9.55	-7.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLIX vs. FALN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is lower than the FALN Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLIX and FALN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLIX	FALN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79	2.01	-1.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.22	0.54	-0.76
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.74	-0.56

Drawdowns

CLIX vs. FALN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLIX drawdown since its inception was -73.21%, which is greater than FALN's maximum drawdown of -29.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIX and FALN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLIX	FALN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.21%	-29.22%	-43.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.57%	-3.96%	-15.61%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.18%	-5.92%	-15.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-68.22%	-18.78%	-49.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.26%	-0.04%	-43.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.70%	-3.32%	-31.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.13%	0.95%	+6.18%

Volatility

CLIX vs. FALN - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) at 1.40%. This indicates that CLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLIX	FALN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.75%	1.40%	+3.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.44%	3.63%	+11.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.77%	4.54%	+16.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.95%	7.31%	+19.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.92%	8.95%	+16.97%

CLIX vs. FALN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FALN's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLIX vs. FALN - Dividend Comparison

CLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than FALN's 6.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF	0.55%	0.46%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF	6.45%	6.31%	6.24%	5.37%	5.08%	3.40%	5.14%	5.35%	5.97%	6.98%	3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLIX and FALN in my portfolio?

CLIX and FALN have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLIX or FALN?

CLIX has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to FALN (1.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLIX dropped -73.21% vs FALN's -29.22%.

Which ETF is better, CLIX or FALN?

On 5-year performance, FALN leads with 3.89% vs -5.94% for CLIX. On fees, FALN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FALN has been the lower-risk option at 1.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CLIX or FALN?

Over the 5-year period, FALN has performed better with a 3.89% return vs -5.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLIX or FALN?

FALN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CLIX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLIX or FALN?

FALN has the higher dividend yield at 6.45%, compared with 0.55% for CLIX.

What is the main difference between CLIX and FALN?

CLIX is categorized as Long-Short, while FALN is High Yield Bonds. CLIX tracks ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index, while FALN tracks Bloomberg US High Yield Fallen Angel 3% Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CLIX and 0.25% for FALN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FALN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.