CLIX vs. FDIS
CLIX (ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF) and FDIS (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLIX is a Long-Short fund tracking the ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index, while FDIS is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CLIX returned -7.74%/yr vs 5.44%/yr for FDIS. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLIX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FDIS.
Performance
CLIX vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLIX achieves a -9.21% return, which is significantly lower than FDIS's -1.40% return.
CLIX
- 1D
- -2.78%
- 1M
- -6.17%
- YTD
- -9.21%
- 6M
- -9.14%
- 1Y
- 8.03%
- 3Y*
- 17.35%
- 5Y*
- -7.74%
- 10Y*
- —
FDIS
- 1D
- -1.74%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- YTD
- -1.40%
- 6M
- -3.81%
- 1Y
- 11.16%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.44%
- 10Y*
- 13.99%
CLIX vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF | -9.21% | 32.81% | 20.73% | 28.97% | -46.73% | -39.96% | 90.91% | 17.32% | 6.34% | -2.43% |
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | -1.40% | 5.67% | 24.43% | 40.48% | -35.23% | 24.25% | 49.50% | 27.44% | -0.88% | 7.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLIX and FDIS is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2017 | 0.62 |
The correlation between CLIX and FDIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLIX vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank
CLIX
FDIS
CLIX vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLIX | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.11 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 0.72 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.06 | 2.21 | -1.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLIX vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLIX drawdown since its inception was -73.21%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIX and FDIS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLIX | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.21% | -39.16% | -34.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.57% | -15.50% | -4.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.18% | -27.43% | +6.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.22% | -39.16% | -29.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -46.37% | -5.93% | -40.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.75% | -7.49% | -27.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.57% | 5.05% | +2.52% |
Volatility
CLIX vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) have volatilities of 6.59% and 6.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLIX | FDIS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.59% | 6.33% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.36% | 13.87% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.50% | 18.76% | +2.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.05% | 23.98% | +3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.92% | 22.36% | +3.56% |
CLIX vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLIX vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison
CLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than FDIS's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF | 0.59% | 0.46% | 0.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FDIS Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF | 0.74% | 0.75% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.58% | 0.59% | 1.14% | 1.29% | 1.00% | 1.62% | 1.25% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLIX and FDIS have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLIX has higher volatility (6.59%) compared to FDIS (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLIX dropped -73.21% vs FDIS's -39.16%.
On 5-year performance, FDIS leads with 5.44% vs -7.74% for CLIX. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FDIS has been the lower-risk option at 6.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 5.44% return vs -7.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CLIX.
FDIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.59% for CLIX.
CLIX is categorized as Long-Short, while FDIS is Consumer Discretionary Equities. CLIX tracks ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index, while FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CLIX and 0.08% for FDIS.
FDIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLIX and FDIS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer