PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CIBR vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CIBR vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CIBR achieves a 18.06% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 12.67% return. Over the past 10 years, CIBR has outperformed FDL with an annualized return of 17.93%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.12% annualized return.


CIBR

1D
0.75%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
18.06%
6M
15.86%
1Y
15.20%
3Y*
24.74%
5Y*
12.80%
10Y*
17.93%

FDL

1D
1.20%
1M
-2.75%
YTD
12.67%
6M
13.02%
1Y
22.39%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
11.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CIBR vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
18.06%13.06%18.21%39.71%-26.46%19.67%50.53%28.52%1.47%18.61%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
12.67%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between CIBR and FDL is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2015

0.38

The correlation between CIBR and FDL shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CIBR vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CIBR
FDL

Technology

95.4%
1.4%

Industrials

2.7%
3.9%

Communication Services

1.9%
10.6%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

4.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

14.4%

Energy

-

25.7%

Financial Services

-

15.2%

Healthcare

-

17.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

6.5%

Technology

CIBR
95.4%
FDL
1.4%

Industrials

CIBR
2.7%
FDL
3.9%

Communication Services

CIBR
1.9%
FDL
10.6%

Basic Materials

CIBR

-

FDL
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

CIBR

-

FDL
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

CIBR

-

FDL
14.4%

Energy

CIBR

-

FDL
25.7%

Financial Services

CIBR

-

FDL
15.2%

Healthcare

CIBR

-

FDL
17.6%

Real Estate

CIBR

-

FDL

-

Utilities

CIBR

-

FDL
6.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CIBR vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CIBR
CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CIBR vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CIBRFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.34

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.69

5.26

-4.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.60

12.40

-10.80

CIBR vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CIBR Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CIBR and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CIBR vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CIBR drawdown since its inception was -33.89%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CIBR and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CIBRFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.89%

-65.93%

+32.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.99%

-4.27%

-17.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.99%

-12.24%

-9.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

-16.46%

-17.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.89%

-41.40%

+7.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.72%

-3.09%

-7.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.66%

-9.64%

+0.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.51%

1.81%

+7.70%

Volatility

CIBR vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a higher volatility of 12.03% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 3.72%. This indicates that CIBR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CIBRFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.03%

3.72%

+8.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.54%

8.09%

+13.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.21%

11.54%

+13.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.07%

14.31%

+10.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.60%

17.11%

+6.49%

CIBR vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CIBR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

CIBR vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than FDL's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
0.49%0.42%0.29%0.42%0.31%0.59%1.10%0.23%0.23%0.10%0.77%0.58%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.70%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


CIBR and FDL have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CIBR has higher volatility (12.03%) compared to FDL (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CIBR dropped -33.89% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, CIBR leads with 17.93% vs 11.12% for FDL. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 3.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 17.93% return vs 11.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CIBR.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 0.49% for CIBR.

CIBR is categorized as Cybersecurity, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CIBR and 0.43% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CIBR and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer