CAFG vs. TMFS
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS).
CAFG and TMFS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CAFG is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on May 1, 2023. TMFS is an actively managed fund by Motley Fool. It was launched on Oct 29, 2018.
Performance
CAFG vs. TMFS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CAFG vs. TMFS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 7.31% | 0.17% | 6.95% | 20.44% |
TMFS Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF | -8.10% | -1.59% | 15.41% | 14.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAFG achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly higher than TMFS's -8.10% return.
CAFG
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -2.69%
- YTD
- 7.31%
- 6M
- 5.20%
- 1Y
- 13.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFS
- 1D
- 3.19%
- 1M
- -9.83%
- YTD
- -8.10%
- 6M
- -7.25%
- 1Y
- -1.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.23%
- 5Y*
- -3.08%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CAFG vs. TMFS - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAFG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than TMFS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CAFG vs. TMFS — Risk / Return Rank
CAFG
TMFS
CAFG vs. TMFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) and Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAFG | TMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | -0.05 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.02 | 0.10 | +0.92 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.01 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | -0.09 | +1.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.89 | -0.25 | +5.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAFG | TMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | -0.05 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.31 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between CAFG and TMFS is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CAFG vs. TMFS - Dividend Comparison
CAFG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%, while TMFS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAFG Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.32% | 0.35% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFS Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 2.37% | 5.57% | 2.65% |
Drawdowns
CAFG vs. TMFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAFG drawdown since its inception was -23.66%, smaller than the maximum TMFS drawdown of -48.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAFG and TMFS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAFG | TMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.66% | -48.79% | +25.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.08% | -15.73% | +2.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.74% | -25.54% | +21.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -19.45% | +13.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.40% | 5.27% | -1.87% |
Volatility
CAFG vs. TMFS - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (CAFG) has a higher volatility of 7.41% compared to Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) at 6.89%. This indicates that CAFG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CAFG | TMFS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.41% | 6.89% | +0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.24% | 14.48% | -1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.41% | 24.44% | -3.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 22.98% | -3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 25.65% | -5.89% |