BILI vs. ATMP
BILI (Bilibili Inc.) is a stock, while ATMP (Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN) is MLPs fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Select MLP VWAP. Over the past 5 years, BILI returned -30.66%/yr vs 15.05%/yr for ATMP. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BILI vs. ATMP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILI achieves a -27.37% return, which is significantly lower than ATMP's 20.60% return.
BILI
- 1D
- -2.72%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- -27.37%
- 6M
- -27.40%
- 1Y
- -10.79%
- 3Y*
- 1.92%
- 5Y*
- -30.66%
- 10Y*
- —
ATMP
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -3.30%
- YTD
- 20.60%
- 6M
- 20.43%
- 1Y
- 18.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
BILI vs. ATMP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILI Bilibili Inc. | -27.37% | 35.78% | 48.81% | -48.63% | -48.94% | -45.87% | 360.37% | 27.62% | 48.88% |
ATMP Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN | 20.60% | 1.73% | 31.66% | 14.51% | 20.71% | 33.06% | -34.39% | 0.39% | -1.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between BILI and ATMP is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018 | 0.14 |
The correlation between BILI and ATMP shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BILI vs. ATMP — Risk / Return Rank
BILI
ATMP
BILI vs. ATMP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bilibili Inc. (BILI) and Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BILI | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.23 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 2.53 | -2.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.60 | 5.89 | -6.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BILI vs. ATMP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILI drawdown since its inception was -94.30%, which is greater than ATMP's maximum drawdown of -80.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILI and ATMP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILI | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.30% | -80.86% | -13.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.06% | -7.30% | -44.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.12% | -16.48% | -36.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.97% | -22.98% | -69.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.58% | -5.61% | -82.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.96% | -31.08% | -26.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.32% | 3.13% | +20.19% |
Volatility
BILI vs. ATMP - Volatility Comparison
Bilibili Inc. (BILI) has a higher volatility of 18.55% compared to Barclays ETN+ Select MLP ETN (ATMP) at 5.64%. This indicates that BILI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATMP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BILI | ATMP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.55% | 5.64% | +12.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.58% | 10.99% | +25.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.74% | 14.18% | +35.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.14% | 22.25% | +56.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.93% | 27.67% | +46.26% |
Dividends
BILI vs. ATMP - Dividend Comparison
Neither BILI nor ATMP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BILI and ATMP have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BILI has higher volatility (18.55%) compared to ATMP (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILI dropped -94.30% vs ATMP's -80.86%.
ATMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BILI and ATMP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer