BILI vs. BABA
BILI (Bilibili Inc.) and BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) are both stocks. BILI operates in Electronic Gaming & Multimedia (Communication Services), while BABA operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, BILI returned -29.25%/yr vs -9.37%/yr for BABA. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BILI vs. BABA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILI achieves a -24.16% return, which is significantly lower than BABA's -13.21% return.
BILI
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -15.03%
- YTD
- -24.16%
- 6M
- -27.77%
- 1Y
- 1.03%
- 3Y*
- 6.78%
- 5Y*
- -29.25%
- 10Y*
- —
BABA
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -13.21%
- 6M
- -19.53%
- 1Y
- 12.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.70%
- 5Y*
- -9.37%
- 10Y*
- 5.74%
BILI vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILI Bilibili Inc. | -24.16% | 35.78% | 48.81% | -48.63% | -48.94% | -45.87% | 360.37% | 27.62% | 29.80% |
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | -13.21% | 75.80% | 11.77% | -10.83% | -25.84% | -48.96% | 9.73% | 54.74% | -23.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between BILI and BABA is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2018 | 0.61 |
The correlation between BILI and BABA shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BILI:
$8.57B
BABA:
$307.20B
BILI:
$3.12
BABA:
$33.90
BILI:
5.98
BABA:
3.75
BILI:
0.27
BABA:
0.38
BILI:
0.55
BABA:
0.29
BILI:
$30.77B
BABA:
$811.51B
BILI:
$11.33B
BABA:
$332.88B
BILI:
$1.53B
BABA:
$112.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BILI vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank
BILI
BABA
BILI vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bilibili Inc. (BILI) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BILI | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.02 | 0.29 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.40 | 0.81 | -0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.09 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 0.34 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.09 | 0.67 | -0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BILI | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 0.29 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.37 | -0.18 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.07 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
BILI vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILI drawdown since its inception was -94.30%, which is greater than BABA's maximum drawdown of -80.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILI and BABA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILI | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.30% | -80.09% | -14.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.06% | -36.77% | -15.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.12% | -36.77% | -16.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.97% | -72.48% | -20.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.07% | -57.76% | -30.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.87% | -37.51% | -20.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.54% | 18.62% | +2.92% |
Volatility
BILI vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison
Bilibili Inc. (BILI) has a higher volatility of 18.51% compared to Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) at 14.74%. This indicates that BILI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BILI | BABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.51% | 14.74% | +3.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.10% | 28.96% | +7.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.11% | 43.68% | +6.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 79.22% | 51.36% | +27.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.87% | 43.38% | +30.49% |
Dividends
BILI vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison
BILI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited | 1.57% | 1.36% | 1.96% | 1.29% |
BILI Bilibili Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BILI vs. BABA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bilibili Inc. and Alibaba Group Holding Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BILI vs. BABA - Profitability Comparison
BILI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bilibili Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.76B and revenue of 7.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.
BABA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a gross profit of 11.75B and revenue of 35.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.
BILI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bilibili Inc. reported an operating income of 165.75M and revenue of 7.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.
BABA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported an operating income of -135.47M and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -0.4%.
BILI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bilibili Inc. reported a net income of 208.51M and revenue of 7.43B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.
BABA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alibaba Group Holding Limited reported a net income of 3.69B and revenue of 35.15B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BILI and BABA have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BILI has higher volatility (18.51%) compared to BABA (14.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILI dropped -94.30% vs BABA's -80.09%.
BABA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BILI and BABA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer