BILI vs. RYCEY

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Bilibili Inc. (BILI) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY).

Performance

BILI vs. RYCEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bilibili Inc. (BILI) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

BILI vs. RYCEY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BILI Bilibili Inc.	-8.26%	35.78%	48.81%	-48.63%	-48.94%	-45.87%	360.37%	27.62%	29.80%
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc	-1.91%	123.64%	88.21%	253.27%	-33.95%	2.53%	-82.05%	-12.69%	-14.39%

Fundamentals

Market Cap BILI : $10.32B RYCEY : $129.57B
EPS BILI : $2.64 RYCEY : $0.99
PE Ratio BILI : 8.56 RYCEY : 15.57
PS Ratio BILI : 0.34 RYCEY : 3.25
PB Ratio BILI : 0.66 RYCEY : 47.61
Total Revenue (TTM) BILI : $30.23B RYCEY : $40.04B
Gross Profit (TTM) BILI : $11.11B RYCEY : $10.10B
EBITDA (TTM) BILI : $1.84B RYCEY : $8.04B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILI achieves a -8.26% return, which is significantly lower than RYCEY's -1.91% return.

BILI

• 1D: 4.01%
• 1M: -19.14%
• YTD: -8.26%
• 6M: -19.69%
• 1Y: 18.05%
• 3Y*: -1.35%
• 5Y*: -27.42%
• 10Y*: —

RYCEY

• 1D: 5.83%
• 1M: -17.19%
• YTD: -1.91%
• 6M: -4.81%
• 1Y: 59.09%
• 3Y*: 105.06%
• 5Y*: 58.30%
• 10Y*: 6.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

BILI vs. RYCEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BILI

BILI Risk / Return Rank: 53
BILI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
BILI Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BILI Omega Ratio Rank: 50
BILI Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
BILI Martin Ratio Rank: 55

RYCEY

RYCEY Risk / Return Rank: 84
RYCEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
RYCEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
RYCEY Omega Ratio Rank: 82
RYCEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
RYCEY Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BILI vs. RYCEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bilibili Inc. (BILI) and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BILI	RYCEY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	1.61	-1.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.86	2.15	-1.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.30	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.44	2.54	-2.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.22	8.86	-7.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BILI vs. RYCEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BILI Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the RYCEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILI and RYCEY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BILI	RYCEY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35	1.61	-1.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.35	1.38	-1.72
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.12	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	-0.25	+0.37

Correlation

The correlation between BILI and RYCEY is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

BILI vs. RYCEY - Dividend Comparison

BILI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RYCEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BILI Bilibili Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RYCEY Rolls-Royce Holdings plc	0.88%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.51%	1.56%	1.32%	1.55%	4.19%	14.44%

Drawdowns

BILI vs. RYCEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILI drawdown since its inception was -94.30%, roughly equal to the maximum RYCEY drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILI and RYCEY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BILI	RYCEY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.30%	-99.07%	+4.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.62%	-21.75%	-17.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.97%	-62.01%	-30.96%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-94.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-85.57%	-80.53%	-5.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.26%	-84.27%	+27.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.22%	6.22%	+8.00%

Volatility

BILI vs. RYCEY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Bilibili Inc. (BILI) is 16.43%, while Rolls-Royce Holdings plc (RYCEY) has a volatility of 17.32%. This indicates that BILI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYCEY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BILI	RYCEY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.43%	17.32%	-0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.60%	25.30%	+10.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.28%	37.09%	+14.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	79.40%	42.67%	+36.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	74.27%	48.90%	+25.37%

Financials

BILI vs. RYCEY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bilibili Inc. and Rolls-Royce Holdings plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

BILI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bilibili Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.07B and revenue of 8.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.5%.

RYCEY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a gross profit of 3.19B and revenue of 11.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

BILI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bilibili Inc. reported an operating income of 496.93M and revenue of 8.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.

RYCEY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported an operating income of 3.23B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.7%.

BILI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Bilibili Inc. reported a net income of 506.31M and revenue of 8.21B, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.

RYCEY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Rolls-Royce Holdings plc reported a net income of 1.42B and revenue of 11.64B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.