PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BILI vs. NTES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BILI vs. NTES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bilibili Inc. (BILI) and NetEase, Inc. (NTES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILI achieves a -27.41% return, which is significantly lower than NTES's -10.00% return.


BILI

1D
-4.29%
1M
-17.70%
YTD
-27.41%
6M
-29.19%
1Y
-0.83%
3Y*
5.23%
5Y*
-30.35%
10Y*

NTES

1D
-1.69%
1M
5.50%
YTD
-10.00%
6M
-11.75%
1Y
-0.92%
3Y*
15.18%
5Y*
3.48%
10Y*
15.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BILI vs. NTES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
BILI
Bilibili Inc.
-27.41%35.78%48.81%-48.63%-48.94%-45.87%360.37%27.62%29.80%
NTES
NetEase, Inc.
-10.00%58.28%-1.73%30.59%-27.35%7.11%57.88%34.66%-13.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BILI and NTES is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2018

0.54

The correlation between BILI and NTES shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.58 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BILI:

$8.20B

NTES:

$79.16B

EPS

BILI:

$3.12

NTES:

$52.95

PE Ratio

BILI:

5.72

NTES:

2.32

PS Ratio

BILI:

0.26

NTES:

0.69

PB Ratio

BILI:

0.53

NTES:

0.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

BILI:

$30.77B

NTES:

$114.39B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BILI:

$11.33B

NTES:

$75.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

BILI:

$1.53B

NTES:

$40.24B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BILI vs. NTES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BILI
BILI Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BILI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILI Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
BILI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILI Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

NTES
NTES Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
NTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
NTES Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
NTES Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BILI vs. NTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bilibili Inc. (BILI) and NetEase, Inc. (NTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BILINTESDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.02

-0.03

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.34

0.17

+0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.02

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.02

-0.03

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.04

-0.06

+0.02

BILI vs. NTES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BILI Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is higher than the NTES Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILI and NTES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BILINTESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

-0.03

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

0.08

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.43

-0.35

Drawdowns

BILI vs. NTES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILI drawdown since its inception was -94.30%, roughly equal to the maximum NTES drawdown of -96.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILI and NTES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILINTESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.30%

-96.41%

+2.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.06%

-30.46%

-21.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.12%

-33.97%

-19.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.97%

-51.38%

-41.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.58%

-21.95%

-66.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.88%

-24.59%

-33.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.77%

16.80%

+4.97%

Volatility

BILI vs. NTES - Volatility Comparison

Bilibili Inc. (BILI) has a higher volatility of 18.86% compared to NetEase, Inc. (NTES) at 9.29%. This indicates that BILI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILINTESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.86%

9.29%

+9.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.33%

20.57%

+15.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.29%

29.21%

+21.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

79.20%

43.67%

+35.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.87%

41.83%

+32.04%

Dividends

BILI vs. NTES - Dividend Comparison

BILI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BILI
Bilibili Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NTES
NetEase, Inc.
1.88%2.21%2.74%1.88%2.10%0.80%0.97%3.19%0.71%1.05%1.36%0.98%

Financials

BILI vs. NTES - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Bilibili Inc. and NetEase, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B20222023202420252026
7.43B
30.59B
(BILI) Total Revenue
(NTES) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BILI vs. NTES - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Bilibili Inc. and NetEase, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
37.1%
69.4%
Portfolio components
BILI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bilibili Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.76B and revenue of 7.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.1%.

NTES - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.22B and revenue of 30.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.4%.

BILI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bilibili Inc. reported an operating income of 165.75M and revenue of 7.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.

NTES - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.66B and revenue of 30.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.4%.

BILI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Bilibili Inc. reported a net income of 208.51M and revenue of 7.43B, resulting in a net margin of 2.8%.

NTES - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported a net income of 10.67B and revenue of 30.59B, resulting in a net margin of 34.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BILI and NTES have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BILI has higher volatility (18.86%) compared to NTES (9.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILI dropped -94.30% vs NTES's -96.41%.

BILI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BILI and NTES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer