PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BETZ vs. METV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BETZ vs. METV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BETZ vs. METV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
-14.85%15.75%10.22%21.17%-42.02%-18.19%
METV
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF
-15.18%30.83%24.93%60.57%-52.66%0.40%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BETZ having a -14.85% return and METV slightly lower at -15.18%.


BETZ

1D
3.13%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
-14.85%
6M
-21.76%
1Y
-0.63%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
-9.64%
10Y*

METV

1D
4.46%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
-15.18%
6M
-22.53%
1Y
18.30%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BETZ vs. METV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BETZ and METV have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

BETZ vs. METV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETZ
BETZ Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
BETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

METV
METV Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
METV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
METV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
METV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
METV Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETZ vs. METV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BETZMETVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.03

0.64

-0.66

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.13

1.08

-0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.14

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.07

0.61

-0.68

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.14

1.63

-1.78

BETZ vs. METV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the METV Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETZ and METV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BETZMETVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

0.64

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.04

+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between BETZ and METV is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BETZ vs. METV - Dividend Comparison

BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, more than METV's 0.21% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
5.37%4.57%0.86%0.00%0.66%0.00%0.28%
METV
Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF
0.21%0.18%0.00%0.17%0.09%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BETZ vs. METV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, roughly equal to the maximum METV drawdown of -59.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and METV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BETZMETVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.82%

-59.64%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.20%

-28.27%

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.39%

-24.97%

-17.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.64%

-26.41%

-7.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.06%

10.62%

+3.44%

Volatility

BETZ vs. METV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) is 8.08%, while Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) has a volatility of 9.46%. This indicates that BETZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BETZMETVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.08%

9.46%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.98%

18.94%

-2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.02%

28.94%

-5.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.27%

30.23%

-2.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.13%

30.23%

-2.10%