BETH vs. NOBL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

BETH (ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BETH is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. BETH is actively managed, while NOBL is passively managed. Over the past year, BETH returned -41.18% vs 10.44% for NOBL. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BETH charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.

Performance

BETH vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETH achieves a -30.85% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 4.61% return.

BETH

• 1D: -2.62%
• 1M: -22.99%
• YTD: -30.85%
• 6M: -34.87%
• 1Y: -41.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NOBL

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 4.61%
• 6M: 4.84%
• 1Y: 10.44%
• 3Y*: 8.56%
• 5Y*: 5.25%
• 10Y*: 9.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BETH vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BETH ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF	-30.85%	-11.20%	85.03%	42.75%
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	4.61%	6.84%	6.72%	9.40%

Correlation

The correlation between BETH and NOBL is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023	0.20

Return for Risk

BETH vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETH

BETH Risk / Return Rank: 2
BETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BETH Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BETH Martin Ratio Rank: 2

NOBL

NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 25
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 24
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETH vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BETH	NOBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.88	0.92	-1.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.22	1.42	-2.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.86	1.16	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.78	1.15	-1.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.33	2.98	-4.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BETH vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is lower than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETH and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BETH	NOBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.88	0.92	-1.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.37	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	0.65	-0.26

Drawdowns

BETH vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETH drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETH and NOBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BETH	NOBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.27%	-35.43%	-17.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.27%	-9.11%	-44.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.36%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.92%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.43%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.27%	-4.99%	-48.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.65%	-3.48%	-14.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	30.89%	3.51%	+27.38%

Volatility

BETH vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) has a higher volatility of 9.18% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 2.40%. This indicates that BETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BETH	NOBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.18%	2.40%	+6.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.80%	8.05%	+27.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	46.84%	11.37%	+35.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.17%	14.39%	+36.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.17%	16.60%	+34.57%

BETH vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETH has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

BETH vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

BETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.10%, more than NOBL's 2.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BETH ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF	59.10%	57.68%	19.71%	0.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.10%	2.14%	2.05%	2.09%	1.94%	1.89%	2.14%	1.89%	2.37%	1.74%	2.13%	2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BETH and NOBL in my portfolio?

BETH and NOBL have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BETH or NOBL?

BETH has higher volatility (9.18%) compared to NOBL (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETH dropped -53.27% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

Which ETF is better, BETH or NOBL?

On 1-year performance, NOBL leads with 10.44% vs -41.18% for BETH. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BETH or NOBL?

Over the 1-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 10.44% return vs -41.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BETH or NOBL?

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BETH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BETH or NOBL?

BETH has the higher dividend yield at 59.10%, compared with 2.10% for NOBL.

What is the main difference between BETH and NOBL?

BETH is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while NOBL is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for BETH and 0.35% for NOBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NOBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.92 vs -0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.