PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BETH vs. BITO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BETH vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETH achieves a -32.64% return, which is significantly lower than BITO's -29.93% return.


BETH

1D
-3.37%
1M
-18.22%
YTD
-32.64%
6M
-32.87%
1Y
-40.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BITO

1D
-3.31%
1M
-18.05%
YTD
-29.93%
6M
-30.03%
1Y
-42.09%
3Y*
18.00%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BETH vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BETH
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF
-32.64%-11.20%85.03%39.34%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
-29.93%-11.19%104.45%52.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BETH and BITO is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023

0.98

The correlation between BETH and BITO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BETH vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETH
BETH Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
BETH Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
BETH Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

BITO
BITO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETH vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BETHBITODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.85

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

-0.80

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

-1.35

+0.11

BETH vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETH Sharpe Ratio is -0.86, which is comparable to the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETH and BITO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BETH vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETH drawdown since its inception was -56.03%, smaller than the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETH and BITO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BETHBITODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.03%

-77.86%

+21.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.03%

-53.10%

-2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.48%

-51.67%

-2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.31%

-36.86%

+18.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.01%

31.28%

+1.73%

Volatility

BETH vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF (BETH) has a higher volatility of 13.75% compared to ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) at 12.79%. This indicates that BETH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BETHBITODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.75%

12.79%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.61%

34.39%

+2.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.49%

44.08%

+3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.18%

55.02%

-3.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.18%

55.02%

-3.84%

BETH vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BETH and BITO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

BETH vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

BETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 60.67%, less than BITO's 71.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
BETH
ProShares Bitcoin & Ether Market Cap Weight Strategy ETF
60.67%57.68%19.71%0.36%
BITO
ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF
71.07%78.29%61.59%15.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, BETH and BITO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BETH has higher volatility (13.75%) compared to BITO (12.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETH dropped -56.03% vs BITO's -77.86%.

On 1-year performance, BETH leads with -40.77% vs -42.09% for BITO. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BITO has been the lower-risk option at 12.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BETH has performed better with a -40.77% return vs -42.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BETH and BITO have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

BITO has the higher dividend yield at 71.07%, compared with 60.67% for BETH.

BETH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.86 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BETH and BITO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer